Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:50:23.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition between Canada thistle and winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

A. P. Mamolos  and
K. L. Kalburtji
A. P. Mamolos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Agriculture, 540 06 Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Canada thistle density and the direct and indirect effects of Canada thistle aboveground biomass and N concentration on wheat yield. A 4-yr experiment (1991–1995) with four Canada thistle densities (0, 4, 16, 64 plants m−2) was conducted. Initial statistical analysis showed a significant effect of Canada thistle density on wheat yield. Multiple regression and path analysis showed that the main factor causing wheat yield loss was Canada thistle N concentration. The second factor affecting wheat yield was Canada thistle biomass, and the last was Canada thistle density.

Keywords

Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. CIRARwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum (L.) Em. Tell. ‘Yecora’Weed densityyield loss predictionbiomass reductioninterferencepath correlation analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 755 - 759
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cousens, R., Brian, P., O’Donovan, J. T., and O’Sullivan, P. A. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35:720–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanakis, M. 1984. Weed species of the Greek flora. Zizaniology 3:201–204. [In Greek]Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Khan, M. 1992. Yield loss assessment for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) infested with Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 40:590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Khan, M. 1996. Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) effects on yield components of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 44:114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Weeds of the World—Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii. pp. 217, 224.Google Scholar
Izaurralde, R. C., Choudhary, M., Juma, N. G., McGill, W. B., and Haderlein, L. 1995. Crop and nitrogen yield in legume based rotations practiced with zero tillage and low input methods. Agron. J. 87:958–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. 1977. Glyphosate for the control of Canada thistle on summer fallow. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:1015–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. C. 1966. Population Genetics. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press. 366 p.Google Scholar
McLennan, B. R., Ashford, R., and Devine, M. D. 1991. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. competition with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Weed Res. 31:409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Blackshaw, R. E., Smith, E. G., and McGinn, S. M. 2000. Cereal cover crops for weed suppression in a summer fallow-wheat cropping sequence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, P. A., Kossatz, V. C., Weiss, G. M., and Dew, D. A. 1982. An approach to estimating yield loss of barley due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, P. A., Weiss, G. M., and Kossatz, V. C. 1985. Indices of competition for estimating rapeseed yield loss due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantone, D. J., Baker, J. B., and Jordan, P. W. 1992. Path analysis of red rice (Oryza sativa L.) competition with cultivated rice. Weed Sci. 40:313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantone, D. J., Williams, W. A., and Maggenti, A. R. 1989. An alternative approach for evaluating the efficacy of potential biocontrol agents of weeds. 2. Path analysis. Weed Sci. 37:778–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peschken, D. P., Thomas, A. G., and Wise, R. F. 1983. Loss in yield of rapeseed (Brasica napus, B. campestris) caused by perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis) in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Weed Sci. 31:740–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. A. and Whitney, D. A. 1998. Long term tillage and nitrogen fertilization in a west central Great Plains wheat sorghum fallow rotation. J. Prod. Agric. 11:353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA Soil Survey Staff. 1975. A basic system of soil classifications for making and interpreting soil surveys. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Agriculture Handbook 436. 754 p.Google Scholar