Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:28:29.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of glufosinate efficacy in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) and sterile oat (Avena sterilis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Debrah F. Lorraine-Colwill
Affiliation:
Department of Applied and Molecular Ecology, Waite Campus, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
Christopher Preston
Affiliation:
CRC for Australian Weed Management and Department of Applied and Molecular Ecology, Waite Campus, Adelaide University, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia

Abstract

Glufosinate efficacy was examined in two major grass weed species, rigid ryegrass and sterile oat. Dose–response pot experiments under controlled environmental conditions showed that sterile oat was more successfully controlled by glufosinate than was rigid ryegrass. Glutamine synthetase was extracted from both species and assayed in vitro. Glufosinate readily inhibited glutamine synthetase activity in both species, indicating no differential sensitivity to the target enzyme. Thin-layer chromatography analysis of glufosinate showed no significant metabolism of glufosinate in either species. Absorption and translocation studies with 14C-glufosinate showed that the radiolabel was rapidly absorbed into the leaves of both species. However, translocation of radiolabeled glufosinate from the treated leaf to the meristematic regions was significantly greater in sterile oat, whereas translocation to the tip of the leaf was significantly greater in rigid ryegrass. This indicates that there is a difference in glufosinate distribution between the two species. It is likely that this difference in the distribution of glufosinate results in sterile oat being more easily controlled by glufosinate than is rigid ryegrass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bayer, E., Guge, K. H., Hägele, K., Hoganmajer, H., Jessipow, S., König, W. A., and Zähner, H. 1972. Stoffwechselprodukte von mikroorganismen. Phosphinothricin und phosphinothricyl alanyl-alanin. Helv. Chim. Acta 11:224239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beriault, J. N., Horsman, G. P., and Devine, M. D. 1999. Phloem transport of D, L-glufosinate and acetyl-L-glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant and -susceptible Brassica napus . Plant Physiol. 121:619627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, M. M. 1976. Protein assay by dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromilow, R. H., Chamberlian, K., and Evens, A. A. 1993. Phloem translocation of weak acid-glyphosate, substituted phosphinoic acid in Ricinus communis L. Pestic. Sci. 37:3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dröge-Laser, W., Siemeling, U., Puhler, A., and Broer, I. 1994. The metabolites of the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (glufosinate). Plant Physiol. 105:159166.Google ScholarPubMed
Gallina, M. A. and Stephenson, G. R. 1992. Dissipation of 14C glufosinate ammonium in two Ontario soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:165168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GenStat. 2000. Release 4.2, Version 5. IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK.Google Scholar
Gill, G. 1996. Ecology of annual ryegrass. Plant Prot. Q. 11:195198.Google Scholar
Hass, P. and Müller, F. 1987. Behavior of glufosinate ammonia in weeds. Pages 10751082 in Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds.Google Scholar
Heap, J. and Knight, R. 1982. A population of ryegrass tolerant to the herbicide diclofop-methyl. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 48:156157.Google Scholar
Jansen, C., Schuphan, I., and Schmidt, B. 2000. Glufosinate metabolism in excised shoots and leaves of twenty plant species. Weed Sci. 48:319326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleier, D. A. 1988. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics. I. Mathematical model unifying the weak acid and intermediate permeability theories. Plant Physiol. 86:803810.Google ScholarPubMed
Komossa, D. and Sandermann, H. 1992. Plant metabolism of herbicides with C-P bonds: phosphinothricin. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 43:95102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandersceid, R. 1993. Irreversible inhibition of glutamine synthetase from higher plants by the herbicide phosphinothricin. Pages 103107 In Böger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Assay for Modern Herbicides and Related Phytotoxic Compounds. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Martin, R. A. and Edington, L. V. 1981. Comparative systematic translocation of several xenobiotics and sucrose. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 16:8796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medd, R. W. and Pandey, S. 1990. Estimating the cost of wild oats (Avena spp.) in the Australian wheat industry. Plant Prot. Q. 4:142144.Google Scholar
Mersey, B. G., Hall, J. C., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidal activity of glufosinate-ammonium: absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:9098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, N. M. 1980. The biology and control of Lolium rigidum as a weed of wheat. Weed Res. 20:117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, B. P., Zumdick, A., Schuphan, I., and Schmidt, B. 2001. Metabolism of the herbicide glufosinate-ammonium in plant cell cultures of transgenic (rhizomania-resistant) and non-transgenic sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris), carrot (Daucus carota), purple foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) and thorn apple (Datura stramonium). Pest Man Sci. 57:4656.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neto, F. S., Coble, H. D., and Corbin, F. T. 2000. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glufosinate in Xanthium strumarium, Commelina diffusa, and Ipomoea purpurea . Weed Sci. 48:171175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wu, J., Hatzios, K. K., and Wu, J. R. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate in five weed species as influenced by ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Sci. 47:636643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1992. On the mechanism of resistance to paraquat in Hordium glaucum and H. leporinum. Delayed inhibition of photosynthetic O2 evolution after paraquat application. Plant Physiol. 100:630636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C., Roush, R. T., and Powles, S. B. 1999. Herbicide resistance in weeds of southern Australia: why are we the worst in the world? Pages 454459 In Bishop, A. C., Boersma, M., and Barnes, C. D., eds. Proceeding of the 12th Australian Weeds Conference. Devonport, Australia: Tasmanian Weed Society.Google Scholar
Purba, E., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1995. The mechanisms of resistance to paraquat is strongly temperature dependent in resistant Hordeum leporinum Link and H. glaucum Steud. Planta 196:464468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastogi, R., Chourey, P. S., and Muhitch, M. J. 1998. The maize glutamine synthetase GS1-2 gene is preferentially expressed in kernel pedicels and is developmentally regulated. Plant Cell Biol. 39:443446.Google ScholarPubMed
Ridley, S. M. and McNally, S. F. 1985. Effect of phosphinothricin on the isoenzyme of glutamine synthetase isolated from plant species which exhibit varying degrees of susceptibility to the herbicide. Plant Sci. 39:3136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. E. 1989. Transformation of the herbicide 14C glufosinate in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:267271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species. Weed Sci. 45:378381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauch, E., Wohlleben, W., and Puhler, A. 1988. Cloning of the phos-phinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tu 494 and its expression in Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli . Gene 63:6574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachibana, K. and Kaneko, K. 1986. Development of a new herbicide, bialaphos. J. Pestic. Sci. 11:297304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebbe, C. C. and Reber, H. H. 1991. Degradation of 14C phosphinothricin (glufosinate) in soil under laboratory conditions: effects of concentration and soil amendments on 14CO2 production. Biol. Fertil. Soils 11:6267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar