Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:22:21.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clomazone dissipation in four Tasmanian topsoils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John P. Cumming ,
Richard B. Doyle  and
Philip H. Brown
Richard B. Doyle
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7005 Australia
Philip H. Brown
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7005 Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clomazone dissipation was examined in four soils in field experiments. Field half-lives were 6 to 59 d (average of four field sites was 35 d) for ferrosol (clay loam), kurosol (loamy sand), sodosol (silt loam), and vertosol (light clay). The Hoerl equation provided a better fit to the measured field concentration at all four sites than did a first-order equation. The order of clomazone dissipation rate was ferrosol > sodosol > kurosol > vertosol. Clomazone desorption varied with soil type, with apparent K d values of 3.6, 1.7, 1.8, and 2.4 for ferrosol, sodosol, kurosol, and vertosol, respectively. Clomazone residues became more strongly sorbed with time, as indicated by desorption hysteresis, but detectable concentrations were present in all soils 1 yr after application. The data indicate that the potential for carryover injury to crops is greatest in the kurosol and least in the ferrosol.

Keywords

ClomazoneClomazone dissipationferrosolkurosolsodosolvertosolfirst-order equationHoerl equation
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 405 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. and Fuerst, E. P. 1990. Carryover injury of clomazone applied in soybeans (Glycine max) and fallow. Weed Technol. 4:855–861.Google Scholar
Anonymous (FMC Corporation). 1987. Technical Information Report on Command. Philadelphia, PA: Agric. Chem. Group. pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992. Effects of tillage and application methods on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40:482–489.Google Scholar
Gallandt, E. R., Fay, P. K., and Inskeep, W. P. 1989. Clomazone dissipation in two Montana soils. Weed Technol. 3:146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunsolus, J. L., Behrens, R. H., Lueschen, W. E., Warnes, D. D., and Wiersma, J. V. 1986. Carryover potential of AC-263,449, DPX-F6025, FMC 57020, and imazaquin in Minnesota. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:52.Google Scholar
Hoerl, A. E. 1954. Fitting curves to data. Pages 55–57 In Perry, J. H., ed. Chemical Business Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Isbell, I. B. 1996. The Australian Soil Classification System. Melbourne: CSIRO. pp. 15–102.Google Scholar
Kirksey, K. B., Hayes, R. M., Charger, W. A., Mullions, C. A., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. Clomazone dissipation in two Tennessee soils. Weed Sci. 44:959–963.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of clomazone on soils, sediments and clays. Weed Sci. 37:440–444.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervosh, T. L., Simms, G. K., and Stoller, E. W. 1995. Clomazone fate as affected by microbial activity, temperature, and soil moisture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43:537–543.Google Scholar
Mills, J. A., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of tillage on the efficacy and persistence of clomazone in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:217–222.Google Scholar
Rayment, G. E. and Higginson, F. R. 1992. Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Sydney: Inkata Press. pp. 17–176.Google Scholar
Simms, G. K., Radosevich, M., He, X. T., and Triana, S. J. 1991. The effects of sorption on the bioavailability of pesticides. Pages 119–137 In Betts, W. B., ed. Biodegradation: Natural and Synthetic Material. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1988. Comparison of application methods and tillage practices on volatilization of clomazone. Weed Technol. 2:323–326.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L., Cranmer, B. K., and Stroup, W. W. 1994. Use of empirical equations to describe dissipation of metribuzin and pendimethalin in soil. Weed Sci. 42:241–248.Google Scholar