Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:00:57.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Control of Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Albert E. Smith
Albert E. Smith*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Georgia, Experiment, GA 30212
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of herbicide formulation and time of herbicide application on smutgrass [Sporobolus poiretii (Roem. & Schult.) Hitchc.] control and phytotoxicity to the major perennial forage-grass species were determined. Dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) applied at rates of 4.8 kg/ha and higher gave excellent control regardless of time of application. However, 4.8 kg/ha dalapon applied to Pensacola bahiagrass (Paspalum notátum Flügg ‘Pensacola′) and bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] in the spring, and to tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb. ‘Ky 31′) in the fall and spring, was phytotoxic. Applications of tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} 80W (80% wettable powder) formulation at 2.4 kg/ha, or fertilizer coated with tebuthiuron at 2.4 kg/ha, gave excellent smutgrass control. The pelleted formulation of tebuthiuron was less phytotoxic to the forage species than the other formulations.

Keywords

Festuca arundinaceaCynodon dactylonPaspalum notatumphytotoxicitydalapontebuthiuron
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , May 1982 , pp. 231 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1981. The 1981 Georgia farm chemical handbook. Univ. of Georgia Coop. Ext. Serv. Publ. 389 pp.Google Scholar
2. Currey, W. L. and Mislevy, P. 1974. Smutgrass control in Florida. Down Earth 29(4):6–9.Google Scholar
3. Currey, W. L., Parrado, R., and Jones, D. W. 1973. Seed characteristics of smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii . Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 32:53–54.Google Scholar
4. Houston, W., Watson, V., and McKie, J. W. 1975. Control of smutgrass in Mississippi. Down Earth 31(1):13–15.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, B. J. 1975. Control of smutgrass with herbicides in turf grasses. Ga. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 169. 17 pp.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, B. J. 1975. Smutgrass control with herbicides in turf grasses. Weed Sci. 23:87–90.Google Scholar
7. McCaleb, J. E. and Hodges, E. M. 1971. Smutgrass control at Range Cattle Station, Ona, Florida. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:182–186.Google Scholar
8. McCaleb, J. E., Hodges, E. M., and Kirk, W. G. 1966. Smutgrass control. Fla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 5–149. 10 pp.Google Scholar
9. Meyer, R. E. and Baur, J. R. 1979. Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control in pastures with herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:361–366.Google Scholar
10. Mislevy, P. and Currey, W. L. 1980. Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control in south Florida. Weed Sci. 28:316–320.Google Scholar
11. Mislevy, P., Currey, W. L., and Brecke, B. J. 1980. Herbicide and cultural practices in smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control. Weed Sci. 28:585–588.Google Scholar
12. Smith, J. E., Cole, A. W., and Watson, V. H. 1974. Selective smutgrass control and forage quality response in bermudagrass-dallisgrass pastures. Agron. J. 66:424–426.Google Scholar
13. Smith, J. E., Cole, A. W., and Watson, V. H. 1975. Carbohydrate response of bermudagrass, dallisgrass, and smutgrass to atrazine, bromacil, and MSMA. Weed Sci. 23:383–385.Google Scholar