Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:19:27.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in weed community composition as influenced by cover crop and management system in continuous corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Paolo Bàrberi  and
Marco Mazzoncini
Marco Mazzoncini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Agronomia e Gestione dell'Agro-Ecosistema, Università di Pisa, Via S. Michele degli Scalzi 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed suppression by cover crops grown during the winter fallow period in continuous corn may lead to a reduction in herbicide use. Rye, crimson clover, and subterranean clover cover crops were compared with corn stubble under a conventional management system (CS) that included plowing and use of preemergence residual herbicides and a low-input management system (LIS) that included no-tillage and use of a presowing nonresidual herbicide for three consecutive years (1994–1996). Cover crop and above-ground weed biomass prior to desiccation were not influenced by management system. Cover crop biomass ranged from 1,420 to 5,657 kg ha−1 for rye, from 563 to 4,217 kg ha−1 for crimson clover, and from 563 to 4,248 kg ha−1 for subterranean clover. At crop planting, rye reduced weed biomass from 54 to 99%, crimson clover from 22 to 46% (with a negative value in 1995), and subterranean clover from 21 to 67%. Weed growth suppression was usually higher in years when cover crop biomass was higher. There were no differences in weed suppression by cover crops later in the season (corn in the fourth leaf stage), while total weed density was higher in LIS than CS in 2 of 3 yr. Total weed cover at corn's ‘full dent’ stage ranged from 1 to 7% in CS and from 24 to 47% in LIS. Cover crops influenced weed composition only in years when cover crop growth was high; otherwise their effect was masked by that of the management system. Weed communities showed higher diversity under LIS than under CS. Consistency of associations between weed species and treatments over sampling dates and years was found especially for some of the species associated with LIS. After 3 yr, redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and black nightshade were regularly associated with rye-LIS at an early corn growth stage; this may indicate a species shift toward a more troublesome composition.

Keywords

Dicambaglyphosatenicosulfuronterbuthylazineblack nightshade, Solanum nigrum L. SOLNIcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALcorn, Zea mays L.crimson clover, Trifolium incarnatum L.redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMARErye, Secale cereale L.subterranean clover, Trifolium subterraneum L.Crop management systemmulchmultivariate analysistillageweed diversity
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , August 2001 , pp. 491 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bàrberi, P., Cozzani, A., Macchia, M., and Bonari, E. 1998. Size and composition of the weed seedbank under different management systems for maize continuous crop. Weed Res. 38:319–334.Google Scholar
Bàrberi, P., Ginanni, M., Menini, S., and Silvestri, N. 1996. Weed development in sunflower as affected by cropping systems characterized by different input levels. Pages 544–549 In Proceedings of the 14th International Sunflower Conference. Beijing.Google Scholar
Bàrberi, P., Silvestri, N., and Bonari, E. 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Res. 37:301–313.Google Scholar
Blum, U., King, L. D., Gerig, T. M., Lehman, M. E., and Worsham, A. D. 1997. Effects of clover and small grain cover crops and tillage techniques on seedling emergence of some dicotyledonous weed species. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 4:146–161.Google Scholar
Braun-Blanquet, J., ed. 1964. Pages 32–53 In Pflanzensoziologie, Gründzuge der Vegetationskunde. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, N. R. and Talbert, R. E. 1996. Weed control and sweet corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) response in a no-till system with cover crops. Weed Sci. 44:355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, W. S. and Werner, E. L. 1997. Effect of winter rye cover crop planting date on weed control in no-till corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 204.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Lafond, G. P., Thomas, A. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci. 41:409–417.Google Scholar
Ditsch, D. C., Alley, M. M., Kelley, K. R., and Lei, Y. Z. 1993. Effectiveness of winter rye for accumulating residual fertilizer N following corn. J. Soil Water Cons. 48:125–132.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. Pages 213–236 In Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Galloway, B. A. and Weston, L. A. 1996. Influence of cover crop and herbicide treatment on weed control and yield in no-till sweet corn (Zea mays L.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duch.). Weed Technol. 10:341–346.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Test for homogeneity of variance. Pages 467–471 In Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A., eds. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. J. 1963. Growth stages of corn (Zea mays L.). Agron. J. 55:487–492.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L., Regnier, E. E., and Cardina, J. 1993. Weed and corn (Zea mays) responses to a hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) cover crop. Weed Technol. 7:594–599.Google Scholar
Ilnicki, R. D. and Enache, A. J. 1992. Subterranean clover living mulch: an alternative method of weed control. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40:249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Defelice, M. S., and Helsel, Z. R. 1993. Cover crop management and weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:425–430.Google Scholar
Lal, R., Regnier, E., Eckert, D. J., Edwards, W. M., Hammond, R. 1991. Expectations of cover crops for sustainable agriculture. Pages 1–11 In Hargrove, W. L., ed. Cover Crops for Clean Water. Ankey, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Mahn, E. G. and Helmecke, K. 1979. Effects of herbicide treatment on the structure and functioning of agro-ecosystems. II. Structural changes in the plant community after the application of herbicides over several years. Agro-Ecosystems 5:159–179.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 1991. Effects of tillage and mulch on weed biomass and sweet corn yield. Weed Technol. 5:545–552.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 1993. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecol. Appl. 3:53–73.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33:487–499.Google Scholar
Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. 1988. Allelochemicals from plants as herbicides. Weed Technol. 2:510–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS/STAT] Statistical Analyis Systems. 1990. SAS User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Schonbeck, M., Browne, J., Deziel, G., and DeGregorio, R. 1991. Comparison of weed biomass and flora in four cover crops and a subsequent lettuce crop on three New England organic farms. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 8:123–143.Google Scholar
Smeda, R. J. and Weller, S. C. 1996. Potential of rye (Secale cereale) for weed management in transplant tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. 44:596–602.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1996. Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9:475–479.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R., Beste, C. E., and Potts, W. E. 1991. Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 39:195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85:673–680.Google Scholar
van der Maarel, E. 1979. Transformations of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39-2:97–114.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1996. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 88:860–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. H., Worsham, A. D., and Blum, U. 1989. Allelopathic potential of legume debris and aqueous extracts. Weed Sci. 37:674–679.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Mortensen, D. A., and Doran, J. W. 1998. Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management. Weed Sci. 46:595–603.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and Chilton, W. S. 1995. Disappearance of DIBOA-glucoside, DIBOA, and BOA from rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 43:18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and York, A. C. 1996. Cover crops for herbicide replacement in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10:815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar