Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:41:10.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canada Thistle Control by Atrazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. V. Parochetti
J. V. Parochetti*
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In greenhouse studies, atrazine (2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine killed Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] when applied as preemergence or postemergence treatments. Postemergence atrazine applications caused more rapid kill when allowed to cover the ground as well as the foliage compared to only foliar atrazine applications. In three field experiments conducted in 1967, 1968, and 1969, Canada thistle was controlled with atrazine and amitrole (3-amino-s-triazole) + NH4SCN. Control resulting from atrazine was as good or superior to amitrole + NH4SCN when both were applied to foliage prior to plowing. Control from 2.2 kg/ha of atrazine applied prior to plowing was 78% for the 3-year average. Atrazine applied preemergence at 2.2 kg/ha resulted in inferior control, whereas postemergence atrazine applications resulted in thistle control similar to treatments applied prior to plowing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 28 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Derscheid, L.A., Nash, R.L., and Wicks, G.A. 1961. Thistle control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals. Weeds 9:90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Halliday, D.L. and Templeman, W.C. 1951. Field experiments in selective weed control by plant growth regulators. Emp. J. Exp. Agr. 19:33–44.Google Scholar
3. Hodgson, J.M. 1958. Canada thistle with cultivation, cropping and chemical sprays. Weeds 6:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hodgson, J.M. 1964. Variations in ecotypes of Canada thistle. Weeds 12:167–171.Google Scholar
5. Hodgson, J.M. 1968. The nature, ecology and control of Canada thistle. U.S. Dep. of Agr. Tech. Bul. 1386. 32 pp.Google Scholar
6. Hodgson, J.M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18:253–255.Google Scholar
7. Rasmussen, L.W. 1956. The effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T applications on the stand density of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.). Weeds 4:343–348.Google Scholar
8. Reed, C.F. and Hughes, Regina D. 1970. Selected weeds of the United States. U.S. Dep. of Agr. Agri. Handbook No. 336. 463 pp.Google Scholar
9. Schreiber, M.M. 1967. Effect of density and control of Canada thistle on production and utilization of alfalfa pastures. Weed Sci. 15:138–142.Google Scholar
10. Trasher, F.P., Cooper, C.S., and Hodgson, J.M. 1963. Competition of forage species with Canada thistle as effected by irrigation and nitrogen levels. Weeds 11:136–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar