Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:59:26.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atrazine- and Diuron-Resistant Strains of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William F. Sutton
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Plant Pathol., and Microbiol., Al. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Alfred E. Brown
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Plant Pathol., and Microbiol., Al. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Bryan Truelove
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Plant Pathol., and Microbiol., Al. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849

Abstract

Photosynthetic growth of 9 of the 11 known species of the family Rhodospirillaceae was strongly inhibited by atrazine. Growth of a wild-type strain of the bacterium Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides van Niel was almost completely inhibited by 100 μM concentrations of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] and diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea]. These herbicides gave 50% inhibition of growth at concentrations of 35 and 25 μM, respectively. Through continuous culture of the wild-type R. sphaeroides in the presence of 100 μM atrazine, strains of the organism were selected in which photosynthetic growth was highly resistant to both atrazine and diuron. Members of the genus Rhodopseudomonas isolated from two natural ecosystems showed various levels of resistance to 100 μM atrazine, but Rhodopseudomonas showing a high level of resistance were more common among the isolates from a pond-mud sample which had been exposed to runoff from atrazine-treated cropland than from a sample of a lake mud never exposed to triazines.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. American Type Culture Collection. 1982. Catalogue of Strains 1. 15th ed. ATCC, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
2. Arntzen, C. J. 1983. The mode of action of herbicides which affect photosynthetic electron transport. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 193.Google Scholar
3. Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Steinback, K. E. 1982. The mechanism of chloroplast triazine resistance: alterations in the site of herbicide action. Pages 185214 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., ed. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Astier, C., Vernotte, C., Der-Vartanian, M., and Joset-Espardellier, F. 1979. Isolation and characterization of two DCMU-resistant mutants of the blue green algae Aphanocapsa 6714. Plant Cell Physiol. 20:15011510.Google Scholar
5. Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. Pages 931 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., ed. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
6. Brown, A. E., Calder, K., and Lascelles, J. 1980. Analysis of membranes from wild-type and mutant strains of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides by crossed immunoelectrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 7:349353.Google Scholar
7. Brown, A. E., Eiserling, F. A., and Lascelles, J. 1972. Bacteriochlorophyll synthesis and the ultrastructure of wild-type and mutant strains of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides . Plant Physiol. 50:743746.Google Scholar
8. Codd, G. A. and Cossar, J. D. 1978. The site of inhibition of photosystem II by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N'-dimethylurea in thylakoids of the cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica . Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 83:342346.Google Scholar
9. Conard, S. G. and Radosevich, S. R. 1979. Ecological fitness of Senecio vulgaris and Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes susceptible or resistant to atrazine. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:171177.Google Scholar
10. Gressel, J., Ammon, H. U., Fogelfors, H., Gasquez, J., Kay, Q. O. N., and Kees, H. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds outside North America. Pages 3155 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., ed. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
11. Holt, J. S. and Radosevich, S. R. 1983. Differential growth of two common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) biotypes. Weed Sci. 31:112120.Google Scholar
12. Krieg, N. R. 1981. Enrichment and isolation. Pages 112142 in Gerhardt, P., ed. Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology. Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
13. Oelze, J. and Drews, G. 1981. Membranes of phototrophic bacteria. Pages 131195 in Ghosh, B. K., ed. Organization of Prokaryotic Cell Membranes. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
14. Pfister, K. and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. The mode of action of photosystem II: specific inhibitors in herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Z. Naturforsch. 34c:996.Google Scholar
15. VanAssche, C. J. 1979. Characterization of a common molecular target for selected structures of photosynthesis inhibiting herbicides. Pages 494498 in Geissbuhler, H., ed. Advances in Pesticide Science. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
16. Warwick, S. I. 1980. Differential growth between and within triazine-resistant and triazine-susceptible biotypes of Senecio vulgaris L. Weed Res. 20:299303.Google Scholar
17. Yamashita, J. and Kamen, M. D. 1968. Inhibition of partial reactions in bacterial photosynthesis by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 153:848853.Google Scholar