Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:22:36.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antimicrobial Activity of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Kremer
Robert J. Kremer*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Ser. Dep. Agron., Univ. Missouri, Columbia 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik. # ABUTH) seeds were bioassayed on 241 microbial isolates to assess their antimicrobial activity. Seeds placed on agar plates inoculated with test microorganisms released a diffusible substance(s) that inhibited the growth of 117 of 202 (58%) bacteria and all of the fungi tested. Antimicrobial activity of the seeds appeared to be nonselective as the extent of inhibition was not related to type of microorganism nor their origin. Hard, water-impermeable seeds had greater inhibitory activity than imbibed (soft) seeds. The intensity of inhibition was affected by prior leaching of seeds with various solvents and by the stage of seed development. Chemical analysis of diffusion zones from agar plates and seed leachates revealed the presence of phenolic compounds. The presence of antimicrobial substances in velvetleaf seeds may contribute to the persistence of viable seeds in soil by inhibiting potential seed-deteriorating microorganisms.

Keywords

Antimicrobial compoundsmicrobial ecologyphenolic compoundsseed longevityABUTH
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 617 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ark, P. A. and Thompson, J. P. 1958. Antibiotic properties of the seeds of wheat and barley. Plant Dis. Rep. 42: 959–962.Google Scholar
2. A.O.A.C. 1980. Tannin. Page 158 in Horowitz, W., ed. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3. Balasubramanian, A. and Rangaswami, G. 1967. On the chemical inhibitors of fungal spores from the seedcoats of three plant species. Curr. Sci. 36:615–616.Google Scholar
4. Bell, E. A. 1978. Toxins in seeds. Pages 143–161 in Harborne, J. B., ed. Biochemical Aspects of Plant and Animal Coevolution. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
5. Bowen, G. D. 1961. The toxicity of legume seed diffusates toward rhizobia and other bacteria. Plant Soil 15:155–165.Google Scholar
6. Dadarwal, K. R. and Sen, A. N. 1973. Inhibitory effect of seed diffusates of some legumes on rhizobia and other bacteria. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 43:82–87.Google Scholar
7. Damm, H. C. 1966. Methods and References in Biochemistry and Biophysics. The World Publishing Co. 154 pp.Google Scholar
8. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1983. Longevity of weed seeds after 5.5 years in the Stoneville 50-year buried-seed study. Weed Sci. 31:264–270.Google Scholar
9. Egley, G. H., Paul, R. N. Jr., Vaughn, K. C., and Duke, S. O. 1983. Role of peroxidase in the development of water impermeable seed coats in Sida spinosa L. Planta 157:224–232.Google Scholar
10. Elmore, C. D. 1980. Free amino acids of Abutilon theophrasti seed. Weed Res. 20:63–64.Google Scholar
11. Ferenczy, L. 1956. Occurrence of antibacterial compounds in seeds and fruits. Acta Biol. Acad. Sci. (Budapest) 6:317–323.Google Scholar
12. Friedman, J. and Waller, G. R. 1983. Seeds as allelopathic agents. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1107–1117.Google Scholar
13. Garber, R. H. and Houston, B. R. 1959. An inhibitor of Verticillium albo-atrum in cotton seed. Phytopathology 49:449–450.Google Scholar
14. Gressel, J. B. and Holm, L. B. 1964. Chemical inhibition of crop germination by weed seeds and the nature of inhibition by Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Res. 4:44–53.Google Scholar
15. Halloin, J. M. 1982. Localization and changes in catechin and tannins during development and ripening of cottonseed. New Phytol. 90:651–657.Google Scholar
16. Henis, Y., Tagari, H., and Volcani, R. 1964. Effect of water extracts of carob pods, tannic acid, and their derivatives on the morphology and growth of microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. 12:204–209.Google Scholar
17. Jacobs, S. E. and Dadd, A. H. 1959. Antibacterial substances in seed coats and their role in the infection of sweet peas by Corynebacterium fascians (Tilford) Dowson. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47:666–672.Google Scholar
18. Johnson, L. F. and Curl, E. A. 1972. Methods for Research on The Ecology of Soilborne Plant Pathogens. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis. 247 pp.Google Scholar
19. Kandasamy, D., Kesavan, R., Ramasamy, K., and Prosad, N. N. 1974. Occurrence of microbial inhibitors in the exudates of certain leguminous seeds. Indian J. Microbiol. 14:25–30.Google Scholar
20. Kraft, J. M. 1977. The role of delphinidin and sugars in the resistance of pea seedlings to Fusarium root rot. Phytopathology. 67:1057–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kremer, R. J., Hughes, L. B. Jr., and Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Examination of microorganisms and deterioration resistance mechanisms associated with velvetleaf seed. Agron. J. 76:745–749.Google Scholar
22. Lueschen, W. E. and Andersen, R. N. 1980. Longevity of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds in soil under agricultural practices. Weed Sci. 28:341–346.Google Scholar
23. Mitscher, L. A. 1975. Antimicrobial agents from higher plants. Recent Adv. Phytochem. 9:243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Nickell, L. G. 1959. Antimicrobial activity of vascular plants. Econ. Bot. 13:281–318.Google Scholar
25. Picman, A. K., Giaccone, R., Ivarson, K. C., and Altosaar, I. 1984. Antifungal properties of oat hulls. Phytoprotection 65:9–15.Google Scholar
26. Price, M. L., Butler, L. G., Rogler, J. C., and Featherston, W. R. 1979. Overcoming the nutritionally harmful effects of tannin in sorghum grain by treatment with inexpensive chemicals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1978. Allelopathy in agroeconomic systems. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 16:431–451.Google Scholar
28. Roberts, E. H. 1972. Dormancy: A factor affecting seed survival in the soil. Pages 321–359 in Roberts, E. H., ed. Viability of Seeds. Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
29. Sanders, T. H. 1977. Changes in tannin-like compounds of peanut fruit parts during maturation. Peanut Sci. 4:51–53.Google Scholar
30. Smale, B. C. and Keil, H. L. 1966. A biochemical study of the intervarietal resistance of Pyrus communis fire blight. Phytochemistry. 5:1113–1120.Google Scholar
31. Stansbury, M. F., Field, E. T., and Guthrie, J. D. 1950. The tannin and related pigments in the red skins (testa) of peanut kernels. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 27:317–321.Google Scholar
32. Stotsky, G. 1972. Activity, ecology, and population dynamics of microorganisms in soil. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2:59–137.Google Scholar