Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:22:51.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorption-Desorption Equilibria of Herbicides in Soil: A Thermodynamic Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Don Wauchope
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
William C. Koskinen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776

Abstract

Because adsorption is a major factor controlling herbicide persistence, activity, and mobility in soils, an extensive literature exists on the measurement of this process. The adsorption data are usually fitted to the Freundlich equation, but attempts to interpret this equation theoretically have had only limited success. A meaningful thermodynamic interpretation of the Freundlich equation can be developed using a proposed standard state for adsorbed herbicide, which assumes that soil organic matter forms a solid solution with the herbicide. When herbicide vapor pressures and aqueous solubilities are taken into account, the losses in free energy of different herbicides, on adsorption onto wetted soil surfaces, are shown to be similar to each other and are slightly less than the loss on absorption to the solid herbicides themselves. The Freundlich exponent is related in a simple way to the decreasing energy of available soil sites as the amount of herbicide adsorbed increases, but this change is relatively small over the range of concentrations used in adsorption experiments. Sample results are given for six triazine, three urea, and one uracil herbicides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Davidson, J. M. 1971. Effect of calcium chloride on prometryn and fluometuron adsorption in soil. Weed Sci. 19:517521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ben-Naim, A. 1972. Thermodynamics of dilute solutions of nonpolar solutes. Pages 425464 in Horne, R. A., ed. Water and Aqueous Solutions: Structure, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
3. Chemical Rubber Co. 1966. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 47th ed., pp F4F5. Chem. Rubber Co., Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
4. Chiou, C. T., Peters, L. J., and Freed, V. H. 1979. A physical concept of soil-water equilibria for nonionic organic compounds. Science 206:831832.Google Scholar
5. Dormant, C. M. and Adamson, A. W. 1980. Symmetrical adsorption thermodynamics. The noninert adsorbent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 75:2333.Google Scholar
6. Getzen, F. W. 1976. Structure of water and aqueous solubility. Pages 363435 in Dack, M.R.J., ed., Solutions and Solubilities: Chemistry, Vol. 8, Part 2. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
7. Grover, R. 1975. Adsorption and desorption of urea herbicides on soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 55:127135.Google Scholar
8. Hamaker, J. W. 1972. Diffusion and volatilization. Pages 341398 in Goring, C.A.I. and Hamaker, J. W., eds., Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Vol. I. Marcel Dekker Publ. New York.Google Scholar
9. Hamaker, J. W. and Thompson, J. M. 1972. Adsorption. Pages 49143 in Goring, C.A.I. and Hamaker, J. W., eds. Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Vol. I. Marcel Dekker Publ. New York.Google Scholar
10. Hance, R. J. 1980. Interactions Between Herbicides and the Soil. Academic Press, New York. 349.Google Scholar
11. Harris, C. I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weeds 14:610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Karickhoff, S. W. 1981. Semi-empirical estimation of sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments and soils. Chemosphere 10:833846.Google Scholar
13. Klotz, I. M. 1964. Chemical Thermodynamics. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York. 468.Google Scholar
14. Koskinen, W. C. and Cheng, H. H. 1983. Effects of experimental variables on 2,4,5-T absorption-desorption in soil. J. Environ. Qual. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lambert, S. M. 1967. Functional relationship between sorption in soil and chemical structure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:572576.Google Scholar
16. Mackay, D. and Paterson, S. 1981. Calculating fugacity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:10061014.Google Scholar
17. McCall, P. J., Laskowski, D. A., Swann, R. L., and Dishburger, H. J. 1981. Measurement of sorption coefficients of organic chemicals and their use in environmental fate analysis. Pages 89109 in Zweig, G. and Boroza, M., eds. Test Protocols for Environmental Fate and Movement of Toxicants. Proc. Symposium, 94th Ann. Mtg., Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Oct. 21–22, 1980, AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
18. McEwen, F. L. and Stephenson, G. R. 1979. The Use and Significance of Pesticides in the Environment. pp 229259, Wiley-Intersci., New York.Google Scholar
19. Mills, A. C. and Biggar, J. W. 1969. Solubility-temperature effect on the adsorption of gamma- and beta-BHC from aqueous and hexane solutions by soil materials. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33:210216.Google Scholar
20. Mills, A. C. and Biggar, J. W. 1969. Adsorption of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexachlorocyclohexane from solution: the differential heat of adsorption applied to adsorption from dilute solutions on organic and inorganic surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 29:720731.Google Scholar
21. Moreale, A. and Van Bladel, R. 1978. Soil interactions of herbicide-derived aniline residues: a thermodynamic approach. Soil Sci. 1978:19.Google Scholar
22. Murray, D. S., Santelmann, P. W., and Davidson, J. M. 1975. Comparative absorption, desorption, and mobility of dipropetryn and prometryn in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:578582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Rao, P.S.C. and Davidson, J. M. 1980. Adsorption and movement of selected pesticides at high concentrations in soils. Water Res. 13:375380.Google Scholar
24. Savage, K. E. and Wauchope, R. D. 1974. Fluometruon adsorption-desorption equilibria in soil. Weed Sci. 22:106110.Google Scholar
25. Sips, R. 1948. On the structure of a catalyst surface. J. Chem. Phys. 16:490495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Spencer, W. F. 1970. Distribution of pesticides between soil, water, and air. Pages 120128 in Pesticides in the Soil: Ecology, Degradation and Movement. Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing.Google Scholar
27. Sposito, G. 1980. Derivation of the Freundlich equation for ion exchange reactions in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:652654.Google Scholar
28. Weber, J. B. 1977. Soil properties, herbicide adsorption, and model soil systems. Pages 5972 in Truelove, B., ed., Research Methods in Weed Science, 2nd ed., South. Weed Sci. Soc., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
29. Weber, J. B. and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption bioactivity, and evaluation of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Weed, S. B. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Pesticide-organic matter interactions. Pages 3966 in Guenzi, W. D., ed., Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI. 562.Google Scholar
31. Weed Science Society of America. 1979. Herbicide Handbook, 4th ed., Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 479.Google Scholar