Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:12:24.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acetanilide Herbicides for Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. A. Dixon ,
E. W. Stoller  and
M. D. McGlamery
G. A. Dixon
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
E. W. Stoller
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric, Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., Agron. Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
M. D. McGlamery
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were undertaken to evaluate the phytotoxicity to yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), length of soil persistence, and tolerance of corn (Zea mays L.) to several acetanilide herbicides. The herbicides involved were alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide]. diethatyl [N-(chloroacetyl)-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)glycine], H-26910 [N-(chloroacetyl)-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)glycine-1-methylethyl ester], metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide], Ortho 19790 [1-(chloroacetyl)-2,2-dimethyl-3-oxa-1-azaspiro-[4, 5]-decane], and Vel 5052 [2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1,3-dioxolan-2-ylmethyl)acetamide]. Most of these herbicides were equally active on yellow nutsedge in solution culture; only metolachlor and Vel 5052 were significantly more active than H-26910. Metolachlor and alachlor were the most toxic to yellow nutsedge in greenhouse and field experiments. Metolachlor persisted the longest of the herbicides in the field after spring applications. The tolerances of corn differed little among the herbicides at expected use rates.

Keywords

Soil persistencecorn tolerance
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , September 1980 , pp. 593 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, T. F. 1975. The problem: yellow nutsedge. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control. Conf. 30:120–121.Google Scholar
2. Gentner, W. A. 1973. Yellow nutsedge control with MBR-8251. Weed Sci. 21:122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Harrison, G. W., Weber, J. B., and Baird, J. V. 1976. Herbicide phytotoxicity as affected by selected properties of North Carolina soils. Weed Sci. 24:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. 347. California Agric. Exp. Stn. 32 pp.Google Scholar
5. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1974. Yellow nutsedge control with soil-incorporated herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition and control in corn (Zea mays . Weed Sci. 27:32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1972. Extent and cost of herbicides and an evaluation of important weeds, 1968. ARS-H-1. 227 pp.Google Scholar
8. Weber, J. B. and Weed, S. W. 1974. Effects of soil on the biological activity of pesticides. Pages 223–256 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc., Wisconsin, 562 pp.Google Scholar