Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:35:37.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Imazaquin in Pitted (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Entireleaf (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula) Morningglory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Risley  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Mark A. Risley
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pitted morningglory and entireleaf morningglory treated with 14C-imazaquin translocated 14C to areas above and below the treated leaf. Pitted morningglory absorbed and translocated more 14C from 14C-imazaquin than entireleaf morningglory. Translocation of 14C from root-supplied 14C-imazaquin was similar in both species 1 d after treatment, with 14C moving rapidly to the shoots. Entireleaf morningglory metabolized slightly more imazaquin than pitted morningglory in treated leaves. Greater tolerance of entireleaf morningglory than pitted morningglory to postemergence applications of imazaquin is attributed to reduced absorption and translocation and increased metabolism of the herbicide in the entireleaf morningglory.

Keywords

Imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. #IPOLA3entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray #IPOHGIPOHGIPOLA
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 503 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, P. C. and Hibberd, K. A. 1985. Evidence for the interaction of an imidazolinone herbicide with leucine, valine, and isoleucine. Weed Sci. 33:479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Minimum effective rate of chlorimuron and imazaquin applied to common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Technol. 3:126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987. Imazaquin (Scepter$rg): A New soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 1:186–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. H., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Response of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Effects of rainfall and temperature on postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025. Weed Sci. 35:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Griffin, J. L. 1985. Postemergence weed control in soybeans using AC-252,214 and DPX-F6025. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:79.Google Scholar
7. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
8. Kelley, T. L. and Oliver, L. R. 1985. Fate of metribuzin in pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and entireleaf (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula) morningglory. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:481.Google Scholar
9. Lee, S. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds: Times and methods for application. Weed Sci. 30:520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Retzinger, E. J. Jr. and Rogers, R. L. 1986. Effect of imazaquin on eight of the most troublesome weeds in Louisiana. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 26:2.Google Scholar
11. Risley, M. and Oliver, L. R. 1991. Efficacy of imazaquin on various weed species. Weed Sci. 39:243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. 1984. Imidazolinones: Potent inhibitors of acetohydroxy acid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Shaner, D. L. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Adsorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252,214 in soybean (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 33:469–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wesley, R. A., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Application timing of metribuzin, chlorimuron, and imazaquin for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technol. 3:364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar