Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:41:32.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Clomazone, Metribuzin and Linuron in Soybean (Glycine max) and Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frederick P. Salzman
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

Research was conducted in soybean and common cocklebur to determine if the synergistic interactions of clomazone plus metribuzin and clomazone plus linuron were due to the effect of one herbicide on root uptake, partitioning, or metabolism of the other. Treatments consisted of 14C-clomazone alone and combined with metribuzin or linuron, 14C-metribuzin alone and combined with clomazone, and 14C-linuron alone and combined with clomazone. Root uptake and partitioning of clomazone applied alone in soybean differed compared to clomazone plus metribuzin. Root uptake and partitioning of metribuzin or linuron did not differ when applied alone or combined with clomazone. Binding of clomazone or its metabolites in an unextractable form may be a method of deactivating clomazone by soybean, but not by common cocklebur. Levels of parent clomazone were higher in common cocklebur roots when clomazone was combined with metribuzin and linuron compared to clomazone done. Levels of parent metribuzin were higher in soybean roots, and in common cocklebur roots and shoots when clomazone was combined with metribuzin compared to metribuzin alone. Levels of parent linuron were greater in soybean shoots when linuron was applied with clomazone compared to linuron alone. These results indicate that the metabolism of metribuzin and linuron is altered in both species when clomazone is applied, leading to increased phytotoxicity.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blankendaal, M., Hodgson, R. H., Davis, D. G., Hoerauf, R. A., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1972. Growing plants without soil for experimental use. USDA Misc. Publ. 1251. 17 pp.Google Scholar
2. Falb, L. N. and Smith, A. E. Jr. 1984. Metribuzin metabolism in soybeans: Characteristics of the intraspecific differential tolerance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 32:14251428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Falb, L. N. and Smith, A. E. 1987. Metribuzin metabolism in soybeans: Partial characterization of the polar metabolites. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 27:165172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Mansager, E. R. 1985. Alternate pathways of metribuzin metabolism in soybean: Formation of N-glucoside and monogluthathione conjugates. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 23:5665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1988. Metribuzin. Pages 191243 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
6. Katz, S. E. 1967. Determination of linuron and its known and/or suspected metabolites in crop materials. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 50:911917.Google Scholar
7. Kuratle, H., Rahn, E. M., and Woodmansee, C. W. 1969. Basis for selectivity of linuron on carrot and common ragweed. Weed Sci. 17:216219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. E., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 3:267269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Moody, K., Kust, C. A., and Buchholtz, K. P. 1970. Release of herbicides by soybean roots in culture solutions. Weed Sci. 18:214218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Nashed, R. B. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1970. Absorption, distribution, and metabolism of linuron in corn, soybean, and crabgrass. Weed Sci. 18:2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Oswald, T. H., Smith, A. E., and Phillips, D. V. 1978. Phytotoxicity and detoxification of metribuzin in dark-grown suspension cultures of soybeans. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 8:7383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Salzman, F. P. and Renner, K. A. 1989. Interaction of clomazone and metribuzin in soybean. Proc. NCWSS 44:86.Google Scholar
13. Salzman, F. P. and Renner, K. A. 1991. The synergistic interactions of clomazone plus metribuzin and clomazone plus linuron. Proc. WSSA 31:18.Google Scholar
14. Smith, A. E. and Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)-one] by soybean cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 32:253257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Vencill, W. K., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1990. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-clomazone in soybean (Glycine max) and three Amaranthus weed species. J. Plant Growth. Regul. 9:127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Vencill, W. K., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1990. Interactions of the bleaching herbicide clomazone with reduced glutathione and other thiols. Z. Naturforsch. 45c:489502.Google Scholar
17. Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36:629–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Westburg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Weston, L. A. and Barrett, M. 1989. Tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) to clomazone. Weed Sci. 37:285289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar