Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:03:41.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Aminocyclopyrachlor in Tall Fescue (Lolium arundinaceum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dustin F. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Rory L. Roten
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Wesley J. Everman
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Travis W. Gannon
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Robert J. Richardson
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Fred H. Yelverton
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Synthetic auxin herbicides are commonly used in forage, pasture, range, and turfgrass settings for dicotyledonous weed control. Aminocyclopyrachlor (AMCP) is a newly developed pyrimidine carboxylic acid with a chemical structure and mode of action similar to the pyridine carboxylic acids—aminopyralid, clopyralid, and picloram. Injury to sensitive dicotyledonous plants has been observed following exposure to monocotyledonous plant material previously treated with pyridine compounds. The absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AMCP has been documented in susceptible broadleaf weeds; however, no information is available, to our knowledge, regarding AMCP fate in tolerant Poaceae, which may serve as the vector for off-target plant injury. Based on this premise, research was conducted to characterize absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AMCP in tall fescue. 14C-AMCP was applied to single tiller tall fescue plant foliage under controlled laboratory conditions at North Carolina State University (Raleigh, NC). Radiation was quantified in leaf wash, treated leaf, foliage, crown, roots, and root exudates at 3, 12, 24, 48, 96, and 192 h after treatment (HAT). 14C-AMCP was rapidly absorbed by tall fescue, reaching 38 and 68% at 3 and 48 HAT, respectively. Translocation of 14C-AMCP was limited to the foliage, which reached maximum translocation (34%) at 96 HAT. Most of the recovered 14C-AMCP remained in the leaf wash, treated leaf, or foliage, whereas minimal radiation was detected in the crown, roots, or root exudates throughout the 192-h period. No AMCP metabolism was observed in tall fescue through the 192 HAT. These data suggest AMCP applied to tall fescue can remain bioavailable, and mishandling treated plant material could result in off-target injury.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2008a. Confront® herbicide product label. Dow Publication No. D02-080-017. Indianapolis, IN Dow AgroSciences. 8 p. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld2QB003.pdf. Accessed: January 30, 2012.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2008b. Lontrel® herbicide product label. Dow Publication No. D02-071-006. Indianapolis, IN Dow AgroSciences. 8 p. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld2QB003.pdf. Accessed: January 30, 2012.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010. Imprelis® herbicide product label. E.I du Pont de Nemours and Company Publication No. H-65717. Wilmington, DE Du Pont. 9.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2011a. Forefront® herbicide product label. Dow Publication No. D02-393-001. Indianapolis, IN Dow AgroSciences. 8 p. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld7IE001.pdf. Accessed: February 3, 2013.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2011b. Milestone® herbicide supplemental product label. Dow Publication No. D02-879-004. Indianapolis, IN Dow AgroSciences. 2 p. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld77N013.pdf. Accessed: January 10, 2013.Google Scholar
Beard, J. B. 1973. Turfgrass Science and Culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall. Pp.132146.Google Scholar
Blewett, C., Roberts, D., and Brinton, W. 2005. Phytotoxicity factors and herbicide contamination in relation to compost quality management practices. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 20:6772.Google Scholar
Bukun, B., Gaines, T. A., Nissen, S. J., Westra, P., Brunk, G., Shaner, D. L., Sleugh, B. B., and Peterson, V. F. 2009. Aminopyralid and clopyralid absorption and translocation in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 57:1015.Google Scholar
Bukun, B., Lindenmayer, R. B., Nissen, S. J., Westra, P., Shaner, D. L., and Brunk, G. 2010. Absorption and translocation of aminocyclopyrachlor and aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 58:96102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, E. P. and Davitt, N. H. 2002. Herbicide persistence in finished compost products: a case study from Penn State. Proc. Northeastern. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:139.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, J., Turner, R., Armel, G., and Holliday, M. 2008. DuPont aminocyclopyrachlor (proposed common name) (DPX-MAT28/KJM44) herbicide for use in turf, IWC, bare-ground, and brush markets. Page 277 in Proceedings of the 5th International Weed Science Congress. Volume 1. Fayetteville, AR International Weed Science Society. [Abstract 654].Google Scholar
Cobb, A. H. and Reade, J.P.H. 2010. Herbicides and Plant Physiology. 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK J. Wiley. Pp. 133155.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Johnson, S. E., and Jennings, K. 2010. Herbicide Carryover in Hay, Manure, Compost, and Grass Clippings. Raleigh, NC North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, North Carolina State University AG-727W. 5 p.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, B. L., Armel, G. R., Bolgunas, S. A., Clark, D. A., Claus, J. S., Crosswicks, R. J., Hirata, C. M., Hollingshaus, G. J., Koeppe, M. K., Rardon, P. L., Wittenbach, V. A., and Woodward, M. D. 2008. Discovery of aminocyclopyrachlor (proposed common name) (DPX-MAT28): A new broad-spectrum auxinic herbicide. Page 9 in Proceedings of the 236th American Chemical Society National Meeting.Google Scholar
Grossmann, K. 2009. Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag. Sci. 66:113120.Google Scholar
Kates, A. H. 1965. A note on damage to tobacco by lateral movement of picloram. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 15:383396.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Moxness, Y. D. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of picloram and 2,4-D in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 37:498502.Google Scholar
Miltner, E., Bary, A., and Cogger, C. 2003. Clopyralid and compost: Formulation and mowing effects on herbicide content of grass clippings. Compost Sci. Util. 11:289299.Google Scholar
Roten, R. L. 2011. Evaluation of Woody Vegetation and Loblolly Pine Responses to Aminocyclopyrachlor. . Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University. 66 p.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A., ed. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 323361.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide Release 9.0. Cary, NC SAS Institute. Pp. 26612844.Google Scholar
Strachan, S. D., Casini, M. S., Heldreth, K. M. 2010. Vapor movement of synthetic auxin herbicides: aminocyclopyrachlor, aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl ester, dicamba, and aminopyralid. Weed Sci. 58:103108.Google Scholar
Valenzuela-Valenzuela, J. M., Lownds, N. K., and Sterling, T. M. 2001. Clopyralid uptake, translocation, metabolism, and ethylene induction in picloram-resistant yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 71:1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandervoort, C., Zabik, M. J., Branham, B., and Lickfeldt, D. W. 1997. Fate of selected pesticides applied to turfgrass: effect of composting on residues. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 58:3845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed