Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:53:21.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of 2,4-D and Glyphosate in Common Milkweed and Hemp Dogbane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. B. Wyrill III
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
O. C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Field and greenhouse studies of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] and glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] absorption, translocation, and metabolism were initiated to explain field observations which indicated susceptibility of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) but not hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum L.) to glyphosate and the reverse response to 2,4-D. Glyphosate was absorbed less than 2,4-D in both species with absorption of both herbicides being greater in common milkweed. Greater herbicide absorption by common milkweed was attributed to less epicuticular wax, less cuticle, lower contact angle of the herbicide spray, and the presence of stomata and trichomes on the adaxial leaf surface. No major translocation differences of the herbicides were noted between species. Translocation of glyphosate was more rapid than that of 2,4-D. More glyphosate than 2,4-D accumulated in areas of high meristematic and metabolic activity. Rapid 2,4-D metabolism occurred in common milkweed leaves above treated leaves. There was no detectable 2,4-D metabolism in hemp dogbane roots after 20 days, while 60% of the 2,4-D in common milkweed roots was metabolized. Limited absorption of glyphosate but not 2,4-D by hemp dogbane and metabolism of 2,4-D but not glyphosate by common milkweed were considered the primary factors involved in explaining observed susceptibility differences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F.M. and Crafts, A.S. 1973. Mode of action of herbicides. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. 504 p.Google Scholar
2. Baird, D.D., Brown, R.H., and Phatak, S.C. 1974. Influence of preemergence herbicides, nitrogen, sod density, and mowing on postemergence activity of glyphosate for quackgrass control. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 28:7687.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, D. and Brenchley, R. 1972. Response of hemp dogbane to the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (MON-2139). Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27:5455.Google Scholar
4. Darlington, W.A. and Barry, J.B. 1965. Effects of chloroform and surfactants on permeability of apricot leaf cuticle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 13:7678.Google Scholar
5. Evetts, L.L. and Burnside, O.C. 1973. Watch out for hemp dogbane. Neb. Quart. 19(4): 1920.Google Scholar
6. Evetts, L.L. and Burnside, O.C. 1973. Milkweed–a persistent perennial that reduces yield. Neb. Quart. 21(1): 1215.Google Scholar
7. Fogg, G.E. 1947. Quantitative studies on the wetting of leaves by water. Proc. R. Soc. (London) Series B 134:503522.Google Scholar
8. Holloway, P.J. 1969. The effects of superficial wax on leaf wettability. Ann. Appl. Biol. 63:145153.Google Scholar
9. Holloway, P.J. and Baker, E.A. 1968. Isolation of plant cuticles with zinc chloride-hydrochloric acid solution. Plant Physiol. 43:18781879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Jaworski, E.C. 1972. Mode of action of n-phosphonomethyl glycine: inhibition of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 20:11951198.Google Scholar
11. Martin, J.T. 1960. Determination of the components of plant cuticles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 11:635640.Google Scholar
12. Martin, J.T. and Juniper, B.E. 1970. The cuticles of plants. St. Martin's Press Inc., New York, N.Y. 347 pp.Google Scholar
13. Parochetti, J.V., Wilson, H.P., and Burt, G.W. 1975. Activity of glyphosate on johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 23:395400.Google Scholar
14. Rioux, R., Bandeen, J.D., and Anderson, G.W. 1974. Effects of growth stage on translocation of glyphosate in quackgrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:397401.Google Scholar
15. Robertson, M.M. and Kirkwood, R.C. 1969. The mode of action of foliage-applied translocated herbicides with particular reference to the phenoxy-acid compounds. I. Mechanism and factors influencing herbicide absorption. Weed Res. 9:224240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sharma, M.P. and Vanden Born, W.H. 1970. Foliar penetration of picloram and 2,4-D in aspen and balsam poplar. Weed Sci. 18:5763.Google Scholar
17. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W.F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235240.Google Scholar
18. Suwannamek, U. and Parker, C. 1975. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulphate and other additives. Weed. Res. 15:1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Terry, P.J. 1973. Fourth Progress Report of the East African Herbicide Research Project-R. 2557. Weed Abstr. 24:144.Google Scholar
20. Terry, P.J., O'Rourke, J.T., and Frame, G.W. 1974. Preliminary results of a field trial to control Eluesine jaegeri . Weed Abstr. 23:273.Google Scholar