Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T05:32:22.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of 14C-Chlorsulfuron in Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Phil J. Petersen
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Beth A. Swisher
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Absorption of 14C-chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonanide} by Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRAR] was 39% following foliar treatment and 16% when added to a nutrient solution in which the plants were growing. Translocation from the treated organ was limited regardless of treatment method; 10% of the applied 14C moved out of the treated leaf and 10% moved from the roots to other parts of the plant following absorption from the nutrient solution. When applied as a foliar treatment, 14C-chlorsulfuron had not been metabolized by Canada thistle 48 h later. However, when 14C-chlorsulfuron was added to the nutrient solution and absorbed by the roots, nearly 25% of the 14C in the plants was present as a polar product(s), 13% had an Rf value identical to benzenesulfonamide standards, and the remaining 62% was chlorsulfuron. Chlorsulfuron was not transformed similarly in a nutrient solution after 6 days in the absence of plants. Suppression of regrowth was the primary injury symptom observed following chlorsulfuron application. Chlorsulfuron also reduced whole plant weight and root bud number and weight.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baradari, M. R., Haderlie, L. C., and Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1980. Chlorflurenol effects on absorption and translocation of dicamba. Weed Sci. 28:197200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bestman, H. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1983. Chlorsulfuron: Effect on and behavior in tartary buckwheat [Fagopyrum tartaticum (L.) Gaertn.]. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 203.Google Scholar
3. Donald, W. W. 1984. Chlorsulfuron effects on shoot growth and root buds of Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 32:4251.Google Scholar
4. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1984. Basis for response differences of two broadleaf weeds to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 32:162168.Google Scholar
5. Henson, M. A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1983. Residual effect of chlorsulfuron on Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] and five crops. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 212A.Google Scholar
6. Hodgson, J. M. 1968. The nature, ecology and control of Canada thistle. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1386.Google Scholar
7. Hodgson, J. M. 1968. Canada thistle and its control. U.S. Dep. Agric. Leaflet No. 523.Google Scholar
8. Messersmith, C. G. and Lym, R. G. 1980. Herbicide and plant growth regulator screening trial on leafy spurge. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 6061.Google Scholar
9. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:10331048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. O'Sullivan, P. H. 1982. Response of various broad-leaved weeds and tolerance of cereals, to soil and foliar applications of DPX-4189. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:715724.Google Scholar
11. Palm, H. L., Riggleman, J. D., and Allison, D. A. 1980. Worldwide review of the new cereal herbicide-DPX-4189. Proc. 1980 Br. Crop. Prot. Conf.-Weeds Vol. 1:16.Google Scholar
12. Parker, C. 1975. Effects on the dormancy of plant organs. Pages 168187 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology-Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
13. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: A new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1017.Google Scholar
14. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: The lack of direct inhibition of plant DNA synthesis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 18:262266.Google Scholar
15. Sweetser, P. B., Chow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: Biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.Google Scholar
16. Thompson, L. Jr., Slife, F. W., and Butler, H. S. 1970. Environmental influence on the tolerance of corn to atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:509514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shimabukuro, R. H., Swanson, H. R., and Walsh, W. C. 1970. Glutathione conjugation, atrazine detoxification mechanism in corn. Plant Physiol. 46:103107.Google Scholar
18. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook, 5th ed. Google Scholar