Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:31:46.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and Translocation of Terbutryn and Propazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Dudek
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Dep. of Bot. and Plant Pathol. and Dep. of Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074
E. Basler
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Dep. of Bot. and Plant Pathol. and Dep. of Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074
P. W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Dep. of Bot. and Plant Pathol. and Dep. of Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074

Abstract

The absorption and translocation patterns of terbutryn [2-(tert-butylamino)-4-(ethylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] and propazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] were determined in wheat (Triticum vulgare Vill. ‘Kaw’) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. ‘RS 612’). Bioassay studies showed sorghum to be tolerant and wheat susceptible to terbutryn. Absorption and translocation of uniform 14C-labeled terbutryn from 1 to 24 hr after initial treatment showed the roots of sorghum and the foliage of wheat to be the major sites of radioactivity accumulation. Foliage was the major site for propazine accumulation with both plant species. Thin-layer chromatography of extracts from terbutryn-treated plants showed that sorghum contained a higher percentage of metabolic breakdown products in the foliage than did the root systems, and wheat contained a high percentage of intact terbutryn in the foliage and roots. High temperature (32 C) enhanced translocation of terbutryn and propazine in both sorghum and wheat. The susceptibility of wheat and sorghum to terbutryn appears to be correlated with a combination of the factors of accumulation within the foliage of the plant and the ability to degrade the terbutryn molecule.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Figuerola, L. F. and Furtick, W. R. 1969. Edaphic factors affecting the activity of terbutryn. Weed Sci. 20:2830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Houseworth, L. D. and Tweedy, B. G. 1971. Interactions of light, temperature, and moisture on terbutryn toxicity. Weed Sci. 19:732735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Montgomery, M. and Freed, V. H. 1961. The uptake, translocation, and metabolism of simazine and atrazine by corn plants. Weeds 9:231237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Sheets, T. J. 1961. Uptake and distribution of simazine by oats and cotton seedlings. Weeds 9:113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Shimabukuro, R. H. 1967. Atrazine metabolism and herbicide selectivity. Plant Physiol. 42:12691276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Shimabukuro, R. H., Swanson, H. R., and Walsh, W. C. 1970. Glutathione conjugation: atrazine detoxication mechanism in corn. Plant Physiol. 46:103107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Sikka, H. C. and Davis, D. E. 1968. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of prometryne in cotton and soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:474477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Thompson, L. Jr. 1972. Metabolism of chloro s-triazine herbicides by Panicum and Setaria . Weed Sci. 20:585587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar