Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:44:55.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control with Fall- and Spring-Applied Triallate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. D. Miller  and
J. D. Nalewaja
S. D. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
J. D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two formulations of triallate [S-(2, 3, 3-trichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate] were evaluated for their effectiveness in controlling wild oat (Avena fatua L.) in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in 12 field experiments conducted between 1967 and 1978. Control of wild oat was greater with fall applications of triallate granules than liquid or with spring applications of either liquid or granules. Further-more, 1.1 kg/ha of triallate granules applied in the fall controlled wild oat as well as did 1.7 kg/ha of liquid triallate applied in the fall. Wild oat control with triallate was usually better when soil incorporated than when surface applied regardless of formulation or time of application. Triallate granules controlled wild oat similarly on either plowed ground or wheat stubble; whereas, liquid triallate controlled wild oat better on plowed ground than wheat stubble. A delay of 8 h in triallate incorporation did not reduce wild oat control with either formulation; however, a delay of 24 h reduced wild oat control with the liquid formulation.

Keywords

Spring wheatsoil incorporationformulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , July 1980 , pp. 416 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banting, J. D. 1967. Factors affecting the activity of di-allate and tri-allate. Weed Res. 7:302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Beestman, G. B. and Deming, J. M. 1976. Triallate mobility in soils. Weed Sci. 24:541–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Evans, D. M. 1970. The performance of tri-allate in granula form for control of Avena spp. and Alopecurus myosuroides . Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 10:842–846.Google Scholar
4. Friesen, H. A., Banting, J. D., and Walker, D. R. 1962. The effect of placement and concentration of 2,3 DCDT on selective control of wild oats in wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Friesen, H. A. 1968. Wild oat control with granular triallate. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 23:17–19.Google Scholar
6. McKercher, R. B., Asford, R., and Morgan, R. E. 1975. Effects of triallate on wild oat grown in a growth chamber. Weed Sci. 23:283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1976. Phytotoxicity of triallate vapors to wild oat. Weed Sci. 24:134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Molberg, E. S., Friesen, H. A., McCurdy, E. V., and Dryden, R. D. 1964. Placement of di-allate and tri-allate for control of wild oats in wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D. 1973. Wild oat infestation of field crops in 1973. North Dakota Farm Res. 31:3–5.Google Scholar