Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:16:29.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in lanceleaved waterplantain (Alisma lanceolatum) in southeastern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gavin J. Ash ,
Eric J. Cother  and
Jennifer Tarleton
Eric J. Cother
Affiliation:
New South Wales Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
Jennifer Tarleton
Affiliation:
New South Wales Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lanceleaved waterplantain is an exotic weed of rice that was introduced into Australia in the 1930s. Since its introduction, it has spread throughout much of the rice-growing region in southeastern Australia. The variability of lanceleaved waterplantain in these regions was studied using polymerase chain reaction-based, inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis. Deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprints from samples of the weed from southeastern Australia were compared between locations and with two samples of common waterplantain, a closely related species. The analysis indicated that there were two distinct groups of lanceleaved waterplantain that correlated with location. From the results of multidimensional scaling analysis, it is hypothesized that the Griffith group did not arise from hybridization between lanceleaved waterplantain and common waterplantain, and that it is more likely that the group arose from a separate introduction into the area. It is also suggested that there is seed movement between areas in the Murray Valley and Colleambally Irrigation areas. The implications of this variation for biological control of the weed are discussed.

Keywords

Common waterplantain, Alisma plantago-aquatica L. ALSPAlanceleaved waterplantain, Alisma lanceolatum With. ALSLArice, Oryza sativa L.Aquatic weedinvasive weedinter simple sequence repeatISSR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , June 2004 , pp. 413 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ash, G. J., Cother, E. J., Jahromi, F. G., Pitt, W. M., Lanoiselet, V. M., and Cliquet, S. 2003a. Status and future for biological control of rice in Australia. Page 51 in Proceedings of 8th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ash, G. J., Raman, R., and Crump, N. S. 2003b. An investigation of genetic variation in Carthamus lanatus in New South Wales, Australia, using inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) analysis. Weed Res 43:1–7.Google Scholar
Aston, H. I. 1973. Aquatic Plants of Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. C. H. and Seaman, D. E. 1980. The weed flora of Californian ricefields. Aquat. Bot 9:351–376.Google Scholar
Björkqvist, I. 1967. Studies in Alisma L. I. Distribution, variation and germination. Opera Bot 17:12–28.Google Scholar
Burdon, J. J. and Brown, A. H. D. 1986. Population genetics of Echium plantagineum, a target weed for biological control. Aust. J. Biol. Sci 39:369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdon, J. J. and Marshall, D. R. 1981. Biological control and the reproductive mode of weeds. J. Appl. Ecol 18:649–658.Google Scholar
Catizone, P. 1983. Farmer's weed control technology in rice in southern Europe. Pages 183–191 in Weed Control in Rice (International Rice Research Institute). Los Banos, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Cother, E. J. 1999. Host range studies of the mycoherbistat fungus Rhynchosporium alismatis . Australas. Plant Pathol 28:149–155.Google Scholar
Cother, E. J. and Gilbert, R. L. 1994. Efficacy of a potential mycoherbicide for control of Alisma lanceolatum and Damasonium minus in Australian rice crops. Aust. J. Exp. Agric 34:1043–1050.Google Scholar
Cother, E. J., Gilbert, R. L., and Pollock, D. C. 1994. First record of Rhynchosporium alismatis on Alisma lanceolatum and Damasonium minus . Australas Plant. Pathol 23:46–49.Google Scholar
Crump, N. S., Cother, E. J., and Ash, G. J. 1999. Clarifying the nomenclature in microbial weed control. Biocontrol Sci. Technol 9:89–97.Google Scholar
Ferrero, A., Tabacchi, M., and Vidotto, F. 2002. Italian rice field weeds and their control. Pages 535–544 in Hill, J. E. and Hardy, B. eds. Second Temperate Rice Conference. Proceedings of the Second Temperate Rice Conference, June 13–17, 1999; Sacremento, California, USA. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Godwin, I. D., Aitken, E. A. B., and Smith, L. W. 1997. Application of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers to plant genetics. Electrophoresis 18:1524–1528.Google Scholar
Gupta, M., Chyi, Y-S., Romero-Severson, J., and Owen, J. L. 1994. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionary diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats. Theor. Appl. Genet 89:998–1006.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, P. M., Tebbitt, M., Watson, K. J., and Gornall, R. J. 1998. Conservation genetics of an arctic species, Saxifgra rivularis L., in Britain. Bot. J. Linn. Soc 128:1–14.Google Scholar
Jahromi, F. G., Ash, G. J., and Cother, E. J. 2002. Genetic variability identified in populations of the rice weed starfruit (Damasonium minus) by simple sequence repeats. Plant Prot. Q 17:151–154.Google Scholar
Jahromi, F. J., Cother, E. J., and Ash, G. J. 2001. The use of a fungal pathogen to reduce weed competition in Australian rice. Page 345 in Proceedings of 13th Biennial Conference of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society, Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimising goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27.Google Scholar
McIntyre, S. and Newnham, M. R. 1988. Distribution and spread of the Alismataceae in the rice-growing region of New South Wales. Cunninghamia 2:25–38.Google Scholar
Nagaoka, T. and Ogihara, Y. 1997. Applicability of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet 94:597–602.Google Scholar
Nissen, S. J., Masters, R. A., Lee, D. J., and Rowe, M. L. 1995. DNA-based marker systems to determine genetic diversity of weedy species and their application to biocontrol. Weed Sci 42:504–513.Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, P. C., Peakall, R., and Briese, D. T. 1999. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) reveals introgression in weedy Onopordum thistles: hybridization and invasion. Mol. Ecol 8:1239–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pogan, E. 1971. Karyological studies in a natural hybrid of Alisma lanceolatum With. × Alisma plantago-aquatica L. and its progeny. Genet. Polon 12:219–222.Google Scholar
Román, B., Staovic, Z., Rubiales, D., Torres, A. M., Cubero, J. I., Katzir, N., and Joel, D. M. 2002. Variation among and within populations of the parasitic weed Orbanche crenata from Spain and Israel revealed by inter simple sequence repeat markers. Phytopathology 92:1262–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Yeh, F. C., Yang, R-C., Boyle, T. B. J., Ye, Z-H., and Mao, J. X. 1997. POPGENE, the User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Edmonton, Canada: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar