Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:04:04.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terbacil and Bromacil Cross-Resistance in Powell Amaranth (Amaranthus powellii)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rick A. Boydston  and
Kassim Al-Khatib
Rick A. Boydston
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Prosser, WA 99350
Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Washington State Univ., Northwest Res. and Ext. Ctr., Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A triazine-resistant Powell amaranth biotype collected in Idaho was approximately six times more resistant to terbacil and sixteen times more resistant to bromacil than a normal susceptible biotype when planted into terbacil- or bromacil-treated soil. The concentration of terbacil required to reduce photosystem II activity by 50% (I50) in isolated thylakoids was 0.24 and 13.33 μM for the susceptible and resistant biotypes, respectively. Likewise, the I50 values for bromacil were 0.33 and 18.4 μM for the susceptible and resistant biotypes, respectively. More 14C-terbacil was bound to isolated thylakoids of the susceptible than the resistant biotype with binding constants (Kb) of 0.26 and 12.9 μM, respectively, indicating that resistance was at the chloroplast level.

Keywords

Bromacil, 5-bromo-6-methyl-3-(1-methylpropyl)-2,4(1H,3H)pyrimidinedioneterbacil, 5-chloro-3-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methyl-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedionePowell amaranth, Amaranthus powellii S. Wats. #3 AMAPOHerbicide resistanceAMAPO
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 513 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Al-Khatib, K. and Paulsen, G. M. 1989. Enhancement of thermal injury to photosynthesis in wheat plants and thylakoids by high light intensity. Plant Physiol. 90:1041–1048.Google Scholar
2. Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:1–15.Google Scholar
3. Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. Pages 9–30 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, , eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Eberlein, C. V., Al-Khatib, K., and Fuerst, E. P. 1991. Distribution, characteristics, and control of triazine resistant Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii S. Wats.) in Idaho. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 31:18.Google Scholar
5. Fuerst, E. P., Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Penner, D. 1986. Herbicide cross-resistance in triazine-resistant biotypes of four species. Weed Sci. 34:344–353.Google Scholar
6. Galloway, R. E. and Mets, L. 1982. Non-Mendelian inheritance of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea-resistant thylakoid membrane properties in Chlamydomonas . Plant Physiol. 70:1673–1677.Google Scholar
7. Hirshberg, J., Yehuda, A. B., Pecker, I., and Ohad, N. 1987. Mutations resistant to photosystem II herbicides. Plant Mol. Biol. 140:357–366.Google Scholar
8. Mazur, B. J. and Falco, S. C. 1989. Development of Herbicide Resistant Crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 40:441–470.Google Scholar
9. Mets, L. and Theil, A. 1989. Biochemistry and genetic control of the photosystem II herbicide target site. Pages 1–24 in Boger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
10. Tischer, W. and Strotmann, H. 1977. Relationship between inhibitor binding to chloroplasts and inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 460:113–125.Google Scholar