Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:09:02.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suppression of Root Diseases and Weeds in Peas (Pisum sativum) Treated with Dinitrophenol and Dinitroaniline Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. F. Sacher ,
H. J. Hopen  and
B. J. Jacobsen
R. F. Sacher
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801
H. J. Hopen
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801
B. J. Jacobsen
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) and certain dinitroaniline herbicides suppressed root rot caused by Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs. and other fungal pathogens in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Dinoseb was the most effective. At 6.72 kg/ha pre-plant incorporated (PPI) it reduced the disease severity index (DSI) in glasshouse bioassays to the level considered safe for general use by commercial growers. In fields tests disease severity was reduced and yield of peas was increased with dinoseb. Dinitroaniline herbicides reduced DSI values to the level considered safe for early crop peas. A simplified DSI method of measuring root rot based on mid-season root symptoms was found to be effective. Weed control was superior with the dinitroanilines and propachlor (2-chloro-N-isoproylacetanilide). Dinoseb significantly reduced weed populations relative to untreated plots. Several dinitroaniline treatments caused stunting and stand reduction.

Keywords

Aphanomyces euiteichesfungal pathogens
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , November 1978 , pp. 589 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carlson, W. C. and Hopen, H. J. 1971. The effects of six herbicides on root rots in seedling vegetable legumes. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 25:79.Google Scholar
2. Eshel, Y. and Katan, J. 1972. Effect of dinitroanilines on solanaceous vegetables and soil fungi. Weed Sci. 20:243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Fletcher, W. W. 1960. The effect of herbicides on soil microorganisms. Pages 20–52 in Woodford, E. K. and Sager, G. R., eds. Black-well's Scientific Publ. Oxford, England.Google Scholar
4. Harvey, R. G., Hagedorn, D. J., and De Longheny, R. L. 1975. Influence of herbicides on root rot in processing peas. Crop Sci. 15:67–71.Google Scholar
5. Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1973. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Residue Rev. 45:145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mitchell, J. E. and Yang, C. Y. 1966. Factors affecting growth and development of Aphanomyces euteiches . Phytopathology 56:917–922.Google Scholar
7. Mitchell, J. E. and Hagedorn, D. J. 1971. Residual dexon and the persistent effect of soil treatment for control of pea root rot caused by Aphanomyces euteiches . Phytopathology 61:978–983.Google Scholar
8. Nelson, D. C. and Nylund, R. E. 1962. Competition between peas grown for processing and weeds. Weeds 10:244–229.Google Scholar
9. Papavizas, G. C. and Ayers, W. A. 1974. Aphanomyces species and their root diseases in pea and sugar beet. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1485. 158 pp.Google Scholar
10. Reiling, T. P., King, T. H., and Fields, R. W. 1960. Soil indexing for pea root rot and the effect of root rot on yield. Phytopathology 50:287–290.Google Scholar
11. Sacher, R. F., Jacobsen, B. J., and Hopen, H. J. 1976. Control of pea root rot with herbicides. Phytopathology (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
12. Sherwood, R. B. and Hagedorn, D. J. 1958. Determining the common root rot potential of pea fields. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 531. 12 pp.Google Scholar
13. Temp, M. V. and Hagedorn, D. J., 1967. Influence of cropping practices on Aphanomyces root rot potential of Wisconsin pea fields. Phytopathology 57:667–670.Google Scholar
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. Compendium of registered pesticides. Vol. 1. Technical Services Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. 3 vols.Google Scholar
15. Wishart, J. 1936. Tests of significance in the analysis of covariance. J. R. Stat. Soc. Suppl. 3:79–82.Google Scholar
16. Wyse, D. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of herbicides on the development of root rot in navy bean. Weed Sci. 24:11–15.Google Scholar
17. Wyse, D. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Herbicide–root rot interaction in navy bean. Weed Sci. 24:16–21.Google Scholar