Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:34:58.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Response to Diclofop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Greg R. Gillespie  and
Stephen D. Miller
Greg R. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in the field, greenhouse, and controlled environmental chambers to determine the injury to sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) from diclofop (2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenoxy] propanoic acid} as influenced by diclofop rate, sunflower line and growth stage, and temperature/relative humidity (RH). Eighteen sunflower lines varied widely in response to diclofop applied postemergence at 2.2 kg/ha with visual injury ratings ranging from 5 to 46%. Neither diclofop-tolerant (Hybrids 894 and 903) nor diclofop-susceptible (Hybrid 923 and Inbred HA290) sunflower lines were injured by diclofop at 10 C. Diclofop injured all four sunflower lines at 30 C. Sunflower injury following diclofop application at 30 C was greater at 90% RH than at 40% RH; and the diclofop-susceptible lines were injured more than the diclofop-tolerant lines. Diclofop injury to sunflower at the two- to four-leaf stage was greater than at any other growth stage in the field and greenhouse. Seed yields of sunflower (Hybrid 894) treated with diclofop in the two- and four-leaf stage was reduced 15 and 12% compared to that of untreated weed-free sunflower, respectively, averaged over diclofop rates.

Keywords

Growth stagetemperaturerelative humiditycultivar
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , July 1983 , pp. 500 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agbakoda, C.S.O. and Goordin, J. R. 1969. Effect of stage of growth of field bindweed on absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled 2,4-D and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:436–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chow, P.N.P. 1978. Selectivity and site of action in relation to field performance of diclofop. Weed Sci. 26:352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Derscheid, L. A., Stahler, L. M., and Kratochvil, D. E. 1952. Differential responses of barley varieties to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D). Agron. J. 44:182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gillespie, G. R., and Miller, S. D. 1980. Differential response of sunflower to herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:31–35.Google Scholar
5. Hammerton, J. L. 1966. Environmental factors and susceptibility to herbicides. Weeds 15:330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1980. Diclofop (Hoelon) for wild oat and green foxtail control. N.D. Farm Res. 38(2): 19–22.Google Scholar
7. Nalewaja, J. D., Adamczewski, K. A., Garcia-Torres, L., Pacholak, E., and Miller, S. D. 1976. Factors effecting HOE-23408 phytotoxicity. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:132–134.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J. D. and Miller, S. D. 1979. Preemergence and post-emergence herbicides in sunflower. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:141.Google Scholar
9. Neidermyer, R. W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. Barban selectivity for wild oat in wheat. Weed Sci. 22:476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat, and green foxtail. Weed Sci. 25:382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:484–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. West, L. D., Dawson, J. H., and Appleby, A. P. 1980. Factors influencing barnyardgrass control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar