Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:36:36.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybeans (Glycine max) as a Rescue Crop Following Cyanazine and Procyazine Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. E. Brewer  and
F. W. Slife
P. E. Brewer
Affiliation:
li Lilly and Co., 1185 Mt. Aetna Road, Hagerstown, MD 21740
F. W. Slife
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1975 and 1976 at Urbana, Illinois, to evaluate soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Amsoy 71′] as a potential rescue crop following the use of cyanazine{2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s-triazin-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropionitrile} and procyazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(cyclopropylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile} with corn (Zea mays L.). Preplant incorporated and preemergence applications of each herbicide were made at the recommended broadcast rates to Dana and Flanagan silt loams. Corn was removed and soybeans were planted 7, 13, and 21 days (1975) or 10, 15, and 23 days (1976) following herbicide application. Visual injury ratings, stands, and yields for soybeans were determined. In spite of varying degrees of visible injury and stand reductions, yields were not reduced significantly when soybeans were planted 3 weeks after cyanazine or procyazine application.

Keywords

Crop rotationsoil persistenceatrazine
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 263 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beynon, K. I., Stoydin, G., and Wright, A. N. 1972. Comparison of the breakdown of the triazine herbicides cyanazine, atrazine and simazine in soils and in maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2:153–161.Google Scholar
2. Beynon, K. I., Bosio, P., and Elgar, K. E. 1972. The analysis of crops and soils for the triazine herbicide cyanazine and some of its degradation products. II. Results. Pestic. Sci. 3:401–408.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. and Schultz, M. E. 1978. Soil persistence of herbicides for corn, sorghum, and soybeans during the year of application. Weed Sci. 26:108–115.Google Scholar
4. Chapman, T., Jordan, D., Payne, D. H., Hughes, W. J., and Schieferstein, R. H. 1968. WL 19,805—A new triazine herbicide. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 2:1018–1025.Google Scholar
5. Fink, R. J. 1972. Phytotoxicity of herbicide residues in soils. Agron. J. 64:804–805.Google Scholar
6. Harris, C. I., Kaufman, D. D., Sheets, T. J., Nash, R. G., and Kearney, P. C. 1968. Behavior and fate of s-triazines in soils. Adv. Pestic. Control. Res. 8:1–55.Google Scholar
7. Hughes, W. J., Chapman, T., Jordan, D., and Schieferstein, R. H. 1967. SD 15418—A new corn herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 22:27–28.Google Scholar
8. Kern, C. L., Peek, J. W., Shriver, J. W., and Chamberlain, E. W. 1974. Procyazine—A new short-residual triazine herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:130.Google Scholar
9. Peeper, T. F. and Weber, J. B. 1976. Activity and persistence of atrazine, procyazine, and Vel 5026 as influenced by soil organic matter and clay. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:387–398.Google Scholar
10. Sheets, T. J. 1970. Persistence of triazine herbicides in soils. Residue Rev. 32:287–310.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Thompson, L. Jr. and LeBaron, H. M. 1975. Procyazine—A new short-residual triazine herbicide for corn. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 79.Google Scholar