Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:18:57.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) and Understory Vegetation to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Meyer  and
Rodney W. Bovey
Robert E. Meyer
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Headquartered at Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 76503
Rodney W. Bovey
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Headquartered at Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 76503
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Honey mesquite [Prosopis glandulosa (Torr.) ♯ PRCJG] was treated with several herbicides and herbicide combinations primarily on the Texas Post Oak Savannah over a 4-yr period. Sprays of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine], picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], and triclopyr {[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acid} generally caused a high degree of canopy reduction in the fall of the year the spraying was done. However, sprays of clopyralid (3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) and picloram were the most effective herbicides for killing honey mesquite 1 yr after application. At 1.1 kg ai/ha, clopyralid killed 70 to 95% and picloram killed 20 to 65% of plants 3 yr or older. Picloram plus 2,4,5-T was intermediate in effectiveness. Sprays of 2,4,5-T and triclopyr killed some plants. Picloram and tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} pellets killed few if any honey mesquite. Hexazinone [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione] boluses killed no more than 37% of the honey mesquite at rates up to 4.5 kg ai/ha. Herbicides sometimes killed more honey mesquite with sprouts 2 or 3 yr old than at 1 yr old.

Keywords

Bay Met 1486buthidazoleclopyralidglyphosatehexazinonekarbutilatepicloramtebuthiuron2,4,5-TtriclopyrPRCJG
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , July 1985 , pp. 537 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1978. Control of huisache with soil applied herbicides. J. Range Manage. 31:179–182.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1985. Herbicide mixtures for control of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 33:349–352.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., and Morton, H. L. 1972. Herbage production following brush control with herbicides in Texas. J. Range Manage. 25:136–142.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Baur, J. R., Diaz-Colon, J. D., Dowler, C. C., and Lehman, S. K. 1969. Granule herbicides for woody plant control. Weed Sci. 17:538–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Meyer, R. E., Flynt, T. O., and Riley, T. E. 1972. Control of yaupon and associated species. Weed Sci. 20:246–249.Google Scholar
6. Fisher, C. E., Meadors, C. H., and Behrens, Richard. 1956. Some factors that influence the effectiveness of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in killing mesquite. Weed Sci. 4:139–147.Google Scholar
7. Hoffman, G. O. 1971. Practical use of Tordon 225 mixture herbicide on Texas rangelands. Down Earth 27(2): 17–21.Google Scholar
8. Jacoby, P. W. and Meadors, C. H. 1982. Control of sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) with pelleted tebuthiuron. Weed Sci. 30:594–597.Google Scholar
9. Jacoby, P. W. and Meadors, C. H. 1983. Triclopyr for control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 31:681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jacoby, P. W., Meadors, C. H., and Foster, M. A. 1981. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Weed Sci. 29:376–378.Google Scholar
11. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1979. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) and Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:280–284.Google Scholar
12. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Control of live oak (Quercus virginiana) and understory vegetation with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 28:51–58.Google Scholar
13. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Hexazinone and other herbicides on Texas woody plants. Weed Sci. 28:358–362.Google Scholar
14. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1984. Response of Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) and understory vegetation to herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:63–67.Google Scholar
15. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1985. Response of herbaceous vegetation in East-Central Texas to herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:81–90.Google Scholar
16. Pettit, R. D. 1979. Effects of picloram and tebuthiuron pellets on sand shinnery oak communities. J. Range Manage. 32:196–200.Google Scholar
17. Scifres, C. J. 1982. Woody plant control in the post oak savannah of Texas with hexazinone. J. Range Manage. 35:401–404.Google Scholar
18. Scifres, C. J. and Hoffman, G. O. 1972. Comparative susceptibility of honey mesquite to dicamba and 2,4,5-T. J. Range Manage. 25:143–145.Google Scholar
19. Scifres, C. J. and Polk, D. B. Jr. 1974. Vegetation response following spraying a light infestation of honey mesquite. J. Range Manage. 27:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1978. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 32:155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Meadors, C. H. 1978. Response of range vegetation to grid placement and aerial application of karbutilate. Weed Sci. 26:139–144.Google Scholar
22. Smith, H. N. and Rechenthin, C. A. 1964. Grassland Restoration. Part I. The Texas brush problem. U. S. Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Serv. Bull. 4–19114. 49 pp.Google Scholar
23. Sosebee, R. E., Dahl, B. E., and Goen, J. P. 1973. Factors affecting mesquite control with Tordon 225. J. Range Manage. 26:369–371.Google Scholar
24. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
25. Winer, B. J. 1971. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
26. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1976. Control of pinyon saplings with picloram or karbutilate. J. Range Manage. 29:144–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar