Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:17:49.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocal Effects of EPTC, CDEC, and Certain Ions on Their Absorption by Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Sebastian Acosta-Nunez  and
Floyd M. Ashton
Sebastian Acosta-Nunez
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
Floyd M. Ashton
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Absorption experiments were conducted with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘VF-315’) seedlings using salts at the approximate ratio found in saline irrigation water (NaCl 41.9 mM, CaCl2 20.9 mM, and MgCl2 · 6H2O 10.5 mM) in combination with two herbicides. The osmotic pressure of this salt solution is 0.40 MPa (mega Pascal), which is equivalent to 4.0 bar or about 4.0 atm. EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) at 0.25 mM reduced the residual Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ content relative to the treatment with salts alone. CDEC (2-chloroallyl diethyldithiocarbamate) at 0.1 mM produced similar effects for Na+ and Ca2+. The addition of salts to either EPTC or CDEC induced significantly higher concentrations of total and residual herbicide in the tomato seedlings. The data suggest that salts reduce the tolerance of tomato to EPTC and CDEC by increasing absorption of the herbicides. The residual EPTC or CDEC in the tomato seedlings increased as the CaCl2 concentrations increased in the incubation medium. A strong linear relationship was found between the calcium content and EPTC or CDEC content in the tomato seedling tissue.

Keywords

Sodiumcalciummagnesium
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , November 1981 , pp. 692 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Acosta-Nunez, S. and Ashton, F. M. 1981. Salinity effects with EPTC and CDEC in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
2. Bagaev, V. C. and Kalimullina, K. H. K. 1968. The sensitivity of carrots to propazine in relation to mineral fertilizer levels. Dokl. TSKhA 133:281–287.Google Scholar
3. Brown, H. D., Neucere, N. J., Altschul, A. M., and Evans, W. J. 1965. Activity pattern of purified ATPase from Arachis hypogaea . Life Sci. 4:1439–1447.Google Scholar
4. Collander, R. 1959. Cell membranes: Their resistance to penetration and their capacity for transport. Pages 2–102. in Steward, F. C., ed. Plant Physiology Vol. II. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
5. Cormack, R. G. H. 1949. The development of root hair in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 15:583–612.Google Scholar
6. Dhillon, P. S., Byrnes, W. R., and Merrit, C. 1967. Simazine and phosphorus interaction in red pine seedlings. Weeds 15:339–343.Google Scholar
7. Dodds, J. A. A. and Ellis, R. J. 1966. Cation-stimulated ATPase activity in plant cell walls. Biochem. J. 101:31.Google Scholar
8. Donaldson, T. W., Bayer, D. E., and Leonard, O. A. 1973. Absorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (monuron) by barley roots. Plant Physiol. 52:638–645.Google Scholar
9. Einset, E. and Clark, W. L. 1958. The enzymatically catalyzed release of choline from lecithin. J. Biol. Chem. 231:703–715.Google Scholar
10. Epstein, E. 1961. The essential role of calcium in selective cation transport by plant cells. Plant Physiol. 36:437–444.Google Scholar
11. Epstein, E. 1972. Mineral Nutrition of Plants. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 412 pp.Google Scholar
12. Jacobson, L., Hannapel, R. J., Moore, D. P., and Schaedle, M. 1961. Influence of calcium on the selectivity of ion absorption process. Plant Physiol. 36:58–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Jacobson, L., Moore, D. P., and Hannapel, R. J. 1960. Role of calcium in absorption of monovalent cations. Plant Physiol. 35:352–358.Google Scholar
14. Johnson, C. M. and Ulrich, A. 1959. II. Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull 766. 46:25–78.Google Scholar
15. Kogan, A. M., Neptune, A. M. L., Nascimento Filho, V. F., Muraoka, T. 1972. Effect of 2,4-D on the absorption and distribution of phosphorus (32P) in maize (Zea mays L.). Universidad de Chile, Boletin Tecnico. No. 36. 6 pp.Google Scholar
16. Marinos, N. G. 1962. Studies on submicroscopic aspects of mineral deficiencies. I. Calcium deficiency in the shoot apex of barley. Am. J. Bot. 49:834–841.Google Scholar
17. O'Donovan, J. T. and Prendeville, G. N. 1977. Uptake patterns of soil-applied 45Ca and 32P in some legume species as influenced by differential trifluralin placement. Weed Res. 17:311–314.Google Scholar
18. Parker, C. 1966. Influence of water hardness on the phytotoxicity of paraquat. Nature (London). 212:1465–1466.Google Scholar
19. Rains, D. W. and Floyd, R. A. 1970. Influence of calcium on sodium and potassium absorption by fresh and aged bean stem slices. Plant Physiol. 46:93–98.Google Scholar
20. Rains, D. W., Schmid, W. E., and Epstein, E. 1964. Absorption of cations by roots. Effects of hydrogen ions and essential role of calcium. Plant Physiol. 39:274–278.Google Scholar
21. Shone, M. G. T. and Wood, A. V. 1974. A comparison of the uptake and translocation of some organic herbicides and a systematic fungicide by barley. I. Absorption in relation to physicochemical properties. J. Exp. Bot. 25:390–400.Google Scholar
22. Sorokin, H. and Sommer, A. L. 1929. Changes in the cells and tissues of root tips induced by the absence of calcium. Am. J. Bot. 16:23–39.Google Scholar
23. Stanley, R. A. 1975. Interaction of calcium and 2,4-D on eurasian watermilfoil. Weed Sci. 23:182–184.Google Scholar
24. Tagawa, T. and Bonner, J. 1957. Mechanical properties of Avena coleoptile as related to auxin and to ionic interactions. Plant Physiol. 32:207–212.Google Scholar
25. True, R. H. 1922. The significance of calcium for higher green plants. Science 55:1–6.Google Scholar
26. Viets, F. G. 1944. Calcium and other polyvalent cations as accelerators of ion accumulation by excised barley roots. Plant Physiol. 19:466–480.Google Scholar
27. Wildes, R. S. and Neales, T. F. 1971. Maintenance of viability of carrot tissue slices in washing solutions after cutting. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24:397–402.Google Scholar
28. Wyn Jones, R. G. and Lunt, O. R. 1967. The function of calcium in plants. Bot. Rev. 33:407–426.Google Scholar
29. Zsoldos, F. and Mecs, P. 1974. Ion uptake and cell membrane behaviour of Synpran N and dacthal herbicide treated rice plants. Acta Biol. Szeged 20:115–120.Google Scholar