Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:57:07.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of Black and Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum nigrum and S. ptycanthum) Growth Using Degree-Days

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Milton E. McGiffen Jr.  and
John B. Masiunas
Milton E. McGiffen Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Illinois, 1201 W. Gregory, Urbana, IL 61801–3838
John B. Masiunas
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Illinois, 1201 W. Gregory, Urbana, IL 61801–3838
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objectives were to compare the growth of black and eastern black nightshade and develop predictive models for their growth. Black and eastern black nightshade were planted on June 3 and 23, and July 12 in 1988 and May 28, June 17, and July 10 in 1989. Exponential models were strongly correlated with the growth of both species across all planting dates. Eastern black nightshade produced more biomass than black nightshade, although weight of berries was equivalent. Leaf area per plant 60 d after planting was five times greater for eastern black nightshade than black nightshade. Eastern black nightshade responded to self-shading by increasing specific leaf area.

Keywords

Black nightshade, Solarium nigrum L. # SOLNIeastern black nightshade, S. ptycanthum Dun. # SOLPTBiomass partitioningspecific leaf areacompetitionweed managementSOLNISOLPT
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 86 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, J. C. 1976. A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days. Environ. Entomol. 5:388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Alm, D. M., Pike, D. R., Hesketh, J. D., and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Leaf area development in some crop and weed species. Biotronics 17:29–39.Google Scholar
3. Fortuin, J. M., and Omta, S.W.P. 1980. Growth analysis and shade experiment with Solanum nigrum L., the black nightshade, a leaf and fruit vegetable in West Java. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 28:199–210.Google Scholar
4. Gorski, S. F. and Wertz, M. K. 1987. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and eastern black nightshade tolerance (Solanum ptycanthum) to acifluorfen. Weed Technol. 1:278–281.Google Scholar
5. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Solanum nigrum L. Pages 430–434 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
6. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1983. Influence of planting date on growth of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 31:180–184.Google Scholar
7. Majek, B. A. 1984. Black nightshade—The problems and solutions in the field and at the plant. Soybean Seed Res. Conf. Proc. 14:102–104.Google Scholar
8. McGiffen, M. E. Jr. and Masiunas, J. B. 1991. Environmental physiology of black and eastern black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L. and S. ptycanthum Dun.) competition with tomato. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 31:37.Google Scholar
9. Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:25–58.Google Scholar
10. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, E. E. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 29:27–32.Google Scholar
11. Perez, F.G.M. and Masiunas, J. B. 1990. Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) interference in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. 38:385–388.Google Scholar
12. Quackenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 32:638–645.Google Scholar
13. Quackenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 33:386–390.Google Scholar
14. Quackenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1985. Susceptibility of five species of the Solanum nigrum complex to herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:386–390.Google Scholar
15. Spitters, C.J.T. and Aerts, R. 1983. Simulation of competition for light and water in crop-weed associations. Aspects Appl. Biol. 4:467–483.Google Scholar
16. Stevans, M. A. 1988. The future of the field crop. Pages 559–580 in Atherton, R. G. and Rudich, J., eds. The Tomato Crop. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
17. Stoller, E. W. and Meyers, R. A. 1989. Effects of shading and soybean Glycine max (L.) interference on Solanum ptycanthum Dun. (eastern black nightshade) growth and development. Weed Res. 29:307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Stoller, E. W. and Meyers, R. A. 1990. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570–574.Google Scholar
19. Teasdale, J. R. 1987. Selectivity of diphenyl-ether herbicides between tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Technol. 1:165–167.Google Scholar