Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:48:47.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiological Basis for Differential Bentazon Susceptibility Among Corn (Zea mays) Inbreds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Laura D. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
Michael Barrett
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
Charles G. Poneleit
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to confirm the bentazon susceptibility of corn inbred GA209 and determine the physiological basis of this susceptibility. Bentazon (1.1 to 4.4 kg ha-1) plus crop oil concentrate (1% by vol) did not cause visible injury or dry weight loss of corn inbred B73 but caused 66 to 89% visual injury and 62 to 70% dry weight reduction of GA209 1 wk after treatment. Bentazon (2.2 kg ha-1) inhibited variable chlorophyll fluorescence decay in GA209 and B73 8 h after treatment. Variable fluorescence decay recovered in B73, but not in GA209, 96 h after treatment. Absorption and translocation of 14C from 14C-bentazon was greater in GA209 than B73 during a 48-h time course. Both inbreds converted bentazon to a polar metabolite which formed 6-hydroxybentazon upon hydrolysis with β-glucosidase. However, 63% of absorbed 14C from 14C-bentazon remained in the parent form in GA209 compared to 25% in B73 over a 72-h time course. A decreased ability of GA209 to metabolize bentazon may explain bentazon sensitivity of this inbred compared to B73.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N., Lueschen, W. E., Warnes, D. N., and Nelson, W. W. 1974. Controlling broadleaf weeds in soybeans with bentazon in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 22:136142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baltazar, A. M. and Monaco, T. J. 1984. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of bentazon by two pepper species (Capsicum annuum and Capsicum Chinese). Weed Sci. 32:258263.Google Scholar
3. Böger, P., Beese, B., and Miller, R. 1977. Long term effects of herbicides on the photosynthetic apparatus. II. Investigations on bentazone inhibition. Weed Res. 17:6167.Google Scholar
4. Connelly, J. A., Johnson, M. D., Gronwald, J. W., and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Bentazon metabolism in tolerant and susceptible soybean (Glycine max) genotypes. Weed Sci. 36:417423.Google Scholar
5. Fleming, A. A., Banks, P. A., and Legg, J. G. 1988. Differential response of maize inbreds to bentazon and other herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:501507.Google Scholar
6. Fonne-Pfister, R., Gaudin, J., Kreuz, K., Ramsteiner, K., and Ebert, E. 1990. Hydroxylation of primisulfuron by an inducible cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase system from maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:165173.Google Scholar
7. Fonne-Pfister, R. and Kreuz, K. 1990. Ring-methyl hydroxylation of chlortoluron by an inducible cytochrome P450-dependent enzyme from maize. Phytochemistry 29:27932796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hayes, R. M. and Wax, L. M. 1975. Differential intraspecific responses of soybean cultivars to bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:516521.Google Scholar
9. Makeev, A. M., Makoveichuk, A. Y., and Chkanikov, D. I. 1977. Microsomal hydroxylation of 2,4-D in plants. Dokl. Bot. Soc. Sci. 232234.Google Scholar
10. McFadden, J. A., Frear, D. S., and Mansager, E. R. 1989. Aryl hydroxylation of diclofop by a cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenase from wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 34:92100.Google Scholar
11. McFadden, J. I., Gronwald, J. W., and Eberlein, C. V. 1990. In vitro hydroxylation of bentazon by microsomes from naphthalic anhydride-treated com shoots. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 168:206243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Mine, A. and Matsunaka, S. 1975. Mode of action of bentazon: Effect on photosynthesis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 5:444450.Google Scholar
13. Mine, A., Miyakado, M., and Matsunaka, S. 1975. The mechanism of bentazon selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 5:566574.Google Scholar
14. Mougin, C., Cabanne, F., Canivenc, M., and Scalla, R. 1990. Hydroxylation and N-demethylation of chlorotoluron by wheat microsomal enzymes. Plant Sci. 66:195203.Google Scholar
15. Otto, S., Beutel, P., Drescher, N., and Huber, R. 1979. Investigations into the degradation of bentazon in plant and soil. Page 551556 in Geissbühler, H. ed. Advances in Pesticide Science. Permagon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
16. Penner, D. 1975. Bentazone selectivity between soybean and Canada thistle. Weed Res. 15:259262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Pfister, K., Buschmann, C., and Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1974. Inhibition of the photosynthetic electron transport by bentazon. Page 675681 in Proc. Third Int. Congr. on Photosynthesis.Google Scholar
18. Retzlaff, G. and Hamm, R. 1976. The relationship between CO2 assimilation and the metabolism of bentazone in wheat plants. Weed Res. 16:263266.Google Scholar
19. Schreiber, U. 1986. Detection of rapid induction kinetics with a new type of high-frequency modulated chlorophyll fluorometer. Photosynth. Res. 9:261272.Google Scholar