Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:51:48.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perennial Weed Populations After 14 Years of Variable Tillage and Cropping Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas D. Buhler ,
David E. Stoltenberg ,
Roger L. Becker  and
Jeffery L. Gunsolus
Douglas D. Buhler
Affiliation:
Nat. Soil Tilth Lab., U.S. Dep. Agric, Agric. Res. Serv., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011
David E. Stoltenberg
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Roger L. Becker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genet., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Jeffery L. Gunsolus
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genet., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Management of perennial weeds is a major concern in reduced-tillage cropping systems. Field research was conducted at Nashua, IA, from 1977 through 1990 to evaluate the long-term impacts of tillage and cropping patterns on perennial weed populations in corn and soybean production. Continuous corn and a corn/soybean rotation were conducted utilizing moldboard plow, chisel plow, ridge tillage, and no-tillage systems. The research area was free of established perennial weed species at the initiation of the experiment in 1977. Hemp dogbane was observed by 1980, with the greatest densities in no-tillage. By 1990, continuous corn had greater hemp dogbane densities with no-tillage than other tillage system by crop rotation treatments. American germander densities were not affected by tillage systems in 1980 and 1981, but by 1990, corn/soybean rotations had greater densities in moldboard plow than other tillage systems. Field bindweed developed primarily in the corn/soybean rotations with the greatest densities occurring in no-tillage. Greater and more diverse populations of perennial weeds developed in reduced-tillage systems than in the moldboard plow system. However, practices used to control annual weeds and environmental factors interacted with tillage to regulate perennial weed populations.

Keywords

American germander, Teucrium canadense L. # TEUCAfield bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L. # CONARhemp dogbane, Apocynum cannabinum L. # APCCAcorn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrConservation tillageconventional tillageno-tillageridge tillagehemp dogbaneAmerican germanderfield bindweedAPCCACONARTEUCA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 205 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, H. J., Cruse, R. M., and Colvin, T. S. 1989. Tillage system effects on crop growth and production costs for a corn-soybean rotation. J. Prod. Agric. 2:273–279.Google Scholar
2. Coffman, C. B. and Frank, J. R. 1991. Weed-crop responses to weed management systems in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:76–81.Google Scholar
3. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Page 1217 in Gray's Manual of Botany. 8th ed. American Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
4. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennen, D. S. H. 1981. Potential changes in weed flora associated with reduced-cultivation systems in cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gebhardt, M. R., Daniel, T. C., Schweizer, E. E., and Allmaras, R. R. 1985. Conservation tillage. Science 230:625–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Gunsolus, J. L. 1993. Corn weed management. Pages 5–15 in Durgan, B. R., Gunsolus, J. L., Becker, R. L., and Dexter, A. G., eds. Cultural and Chemical Weed Control in Field Crops. Univ. Minn. Ext. Serv., AG-BU-3157-S.Google Scholar
7. Haas, H. and Streibig, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. Pages 57–79 in Le Baron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
8. Koskinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:365–370.Google Scholar
9. Mann, H. and Cavers, P. B. 1979. The regenerative capacity of root cuttings of Taraxacum officinale Weber under natural conditions. Can. J. Bot. 57:1783–1791.Google Scholar
10. Pollard, F. and Cussans, G. W. 1976. The influence of tillage on the weed flora of four sites sown to successive crops of spring barley. Proc. 13th Br. Weed Control Conf. 13:1019–1028.Google Scholar
11. Stoller, E. W. 1981. Yellow nutsedge: a menace in the corn belt. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. No. 1642. 16 pp.Google Scholar
12. Swanton, C. R. and Cavers, P. B. 1988. Regenerative capacity of rhizomes and tubers from two populations of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Weed Res. 28:339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Timmons, F. L. and Bruns, V. F. 1951. Frequency and depth of shoot-cutting in eradication of certain creeping perennial weeds. Agron. J. 43:371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. Pages 26–40 in Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems, Weise, A. F., ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Mongr. 2, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
15. Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wyse, D. L. and Strand, O. E. 1979. American germander (Teucrium canadense) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 27:615–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar