Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:05:16.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of Weed Migration in Northwestern U.S.A.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frank Forcella
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS-NCSCRL, Morris, MN 56267
Stephen J. Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol., Montana State Unvi., Bozeman, MT 59717

Abstract

Patterns of spread of 85 weed species alien to the northwestern U.S. were simulated using principal coordinate analysis on primarily herbaria-derived data. The primary pattern detected was a west-to-east migration of weeds. The point of introduction for most weeds following this pattern appeared to be near Portland, OR, an important shipping port in the past. An east-to-west migration represented a secondary pattern. The major cattle and wheat-cropping areas of east-central Montana were the apparent introduction points for weeds following this pattern. The grain and pulse region of eastern Washington represented the point of introduction of species following a third pattern of migration. These weeds subsequently spread southward to Utah and then laterally to the east and west. Historical weed migration patterns provide insight to probable points of origin and routes of currently spreading weeds as well as those that will spread in the future. Such insight may aid in the containment of future spreading weeds.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, H. G. 1986. Patterns of plant invasion in North America. Pages 4457 in Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J. A., eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer -Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
2. Belles, W. S., Wattenbarger, D. W., and Lee, G. A. 1981. Chemical control of Crupina vulgaris, a new rangeland weed in Idaho and the United States. J. Range Manage. 34:468470.Google Scholar
3. Blankenship, J. 1901. Weeds of Montana. Montana Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 30:270.Google Scholar
4. Cullen, J. M. and Groves, R. H. 1977. The population biology of Chondrilla juncea L. in Australia. Ecol. Soc. Aust. Proc. 10:121134.Google Scholar
5. Forcella, F. 1985. Spread of kochia in the northwestern United States. Weeds Today 16:46.Google Scholar
6. Forcella, F. 1985. Final distribution is related to rate of spread in alien weeds. Weed Res. 25:181191.Google Scholar
7. Forcella, F. 1986. Characteristics distinguishing invasive weeds within Echium (Bugloss). Weed Res. 26:352364.Google Scholar
8. Forcella, F. and Harvey, S. J. 1982. Spread of Filago arvensis L. (Compositae) in the United States. Madrono 29:119121.Google Scholar
9. Kloot, P. M. 1983. Early records of alien plants naturalized in South Australia. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 6:93131.Google Scholar
10. Mack, R. N. 1981. Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems 7:145165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Mack, R. N. 1986. Alien plant invasion into the Intermountain West: A case history. Pages 191213 in Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J. A., eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
12. Plummer, G. L. and Keever, C. 1973. Autumnal daylight, weather and camphor-weed dispersal in the Georgia Piedmont region. Bot. Gaz. 124:283289.Google Scholar
13. Salisbury, E. J. 1961. Weed and Aliens. The MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
14. Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
15. Williams, W. T. 1976. Pattern Analysis in Agricultural Science. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar