Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:43:48.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lipid Metabolism as a Site of Herbicide Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. B. St. John  and
J. L. Hilton
J. B. St. John
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., Agr. Res. Center, Agr. Environ. Qual. Inst., Beltsville, MD 20705
J. L. Hilton
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., Agr. Res. Center, Agr. Environ. Qual. Inst., Beltsville, MD 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) and MBR 8251 [1,1 1-trifluoro-4′-(phenylsulfonyl)-methanesulfono-o-toluidide] inhibited enzymic synthesis of glycerides in vitro. The physiological significance of this inhibition was confirmed in intact wheat [Triticum aestivum L., ‘Mediterranean’ (C.I. 5303)] seedlings; dinoseb and MBR 8251 inhibition of glyceride synthesis in vivo was evidenced by a buildup in free fatty acids and a decrease in neutral and polar lipids. Glyceride synthesis and growth were reduced approximately equally by dinoseb and MBR 8251. However, polar (membrane) lipids were reduced more drastically than growth. It is suggested that dinoseb and MBR 8251 alter membrane structure and function through an inhibition of membrane lipid synthesis. DNP (dinitrophenol) was only slightly inhibitory in either the in vitro or in vivo system. Dinoseb was more effective than MBR 8251 in destruction of cell membrane permeability of intact roots immediately after treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , September 1973 , pp. 477 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Benson, A. A. 1964. Plant membrane lipids. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 15:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Böttcher, C. J., Woodford, F. P., Boelsma-Van Houte, E., and Gent, C. M. 1959. Methods for the analysis of lipids extracted from human arteries and other tissues. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas. 78:794–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Burchfield, H. P. and Storrs, E. E. 1962. Biochemical application of gas chromatography. Academic Press, New York. 680 pp.Google Scholar
4. Butt, V. S. and Beevers, H. 1966. The plant lipids. In Steward, F. C., ed. Plant physiology, Academic Press, New York. 599 pp.Google Scholar
5. Cheniae, G. M. 1965. Phosphatidic acid and glyceride synthesis by particles from spinach leaves. Plant Physiol. 40:235–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Folch, J., Lees, M., and Stanley, T. H. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Gentner, W. A. 1972. Yellow nutsedge control with MBR 8251. Weed Sci. 21:123–124.Google Scholar
8. Hancock, J. G. 1972. Changes in cell membrane permeability in sunflower hypocotyls infected with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum . Plant Physiol. 49:358–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Hilton, J. L. and Christiansen, M. N. 1972. Lipid contribution to selective action of trifluralin. Weed Sci. 20:290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hilton, J. L., St. John, J. B., Christiansen, M. N., and Norris, K. H. 1971. Interaction of lipoidal materials and a pyridazinone inhibitor of chloroplast development. Plant Physiol. 48:171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hitchcock, C. and Nichols, B. W. 1971. Plant lipid biochemistry. Academic Press, New York. 387 pp.Google Scholar
12. Holden, J. T., Hild, O., Wang-Leung, Y. L., and Rouser, G. 1970. Reduced lipid content as the basis for defective amino acid accumulation capacity in pantothenate- and biotin-deficient Lactobacillus plantarum . Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 40:123–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Lai, M. T., Wienhold, A. R., and Hancock, J. G. 1968. Permeability changes in Phaseolus aureus associated with infection by Rhizoctonia solani . Phytopathology 58:240–245.Google Scholar
14. Mann, J. D. and Pu, M. 1968. Inhibition of lipid synthesis by certain herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:197–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Metcalf, L. D. and Schmitz, A. A. 1961. The rapid preparation of fatty acid esters for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal. Chem. 33:363–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Penner, D. and Meggitt, W. F. 1970. Herbicide effects on soybeans, (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) seed lipids. Crop Sci. 10:553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Roughan, P. G. and Boardman, N. K. 1972. Lipid composition of pea and bean leaves during chloroplast development. Plant Physiol. 50:31–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Shorland, F. B. 1961. Acetone-soluble lipids of grasses and other forage plants. II. General observations on the properties of the lipids with special reference to the yield of fatty acids. J. Sci. Food Agr. 12:39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Smith, A. E. 1972. Lipid influence on 2,4-D transport and accumulation. Weed Sci. 20:46–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Stumpf, P. K. 1965. Lipid metabolism. In Bonner, J. and Varner, J., eds. Plant biochemistry, Academic Press, New York. 1054 pp.Google Scholar
21. Thompson, G. A. 1965. Cellular membranes. In Bonner, J. and Varner, J., eds. Plant biochemistry, Academic Press, New York. 1054 pp.Google Scholar
22. Trémolieres, A. and Lepage, M. 1971. Changes in lipid composition during greening of etiolated pea seedlings. Plant Physiol. 47:329–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed