Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:49:42.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference and Control of Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi) in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. Kent Harrison ,
C. Steven Williams  and
Loyd M. Wax
S. Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
C. Steven Williams
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interference studies utilizing manipulated and natural infestations of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFA) in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams’] were conducted at Urbana, IL, in 1982 and 1983. Giant foxtail clumps, each consisting of 3 to 6 plants per dm2, were used to determine the effect of clump density on giant foxtail dry weight and soybean seed yield. In both years, regression equations predicted a soybean seed yield loss of 0.8% for each giant foxtail clump per 9 m of row. The highest density of 30 clumps per 9 m of row reduced soybean yield 26%. In a second study, fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[(5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} at 0.28 kg ai/ha or fluazifop + alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 0.28 + 2.24 kg/ha applied 10 or 15 days after emergence gave maximum giant foxtail control with little or no reduction in soybean seed yield. Interference from uncontrolled giant foxtail began to reduce soybean dry-matter accumulation 15 days after emergence under favorable growing conditions in 1982. Under less favorable conditions in 1983, similar effects were not observed until 25 days after emergence.

Keywords

Competitionintegrated weed managementinterspecific interferenceweed lossesSETFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 203 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chamblee, R. W., Thompson, L. Jr., and Coble, H. D. 1982. Interference of broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) in peanuts (Arachis hypogea). Weed Sci. 30:45–49.Google Scholar
2. Chatterjee, S. and Price, B. 1977. Regression Analysis by Example. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 228 pp.Google Scholar
3. Coble, H. D., Williams, F. M., and Ritter, R. L. 1981. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:339–342.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1970. Time and duration of weed infestations in relation to weed-crop competition. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:13–25.Google Scholar
5. Harper, J. L. 1977. The influence of density on yield and mortality. Pages 151–194 in Harper, J. L., ed. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
6. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. and Shaw, W. C. 1982. Research needs for integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci. Suppl. 1 to Vol. 30:40–45.Google Scholar
10. Peterson, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:205–208.Google Scholar
11. Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139–142.Google Scholar
12. Schreiber, M. M. 1965. Effect of date of planting and stage of cutting on seed production of giant foxtail. Weeds 13:60–62.Google Scholar
13. Schreiber, M. M. 1977. Longevity of foxtail taxa in undisturbed sites. Weed Sci. 25:66–72.Google Scholar
14. Schreiber, M. M. 1982. Modeling the biology of weeds for integrated weed management. Weed Sci. Suppl. 1 to Vol. 30:13–16.Google Scholar
15. Schweizer, E. E. and Bridge, L. D. 1982. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 30:514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shaw, W. C. 1982. Integrated weed management systems technology for pest management. Weed Sci. Suppl. 1 to Vol. 30: 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Staniforth, D. W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species on soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.Google Scholar
18. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
19. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop Competition. A Review. Int. Plant Prot. Center, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. 195 pp.Google Scholar