Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:37:24.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of biological control of common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) and chemical control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jos Frantzen ,
Federico Rossi  and
Heinz Müller-Schärer
Federico Rossi
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, 3, Rue Albert-Gockel, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
Heinz Müller-Schärer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, 3, Rue Albert-Gockel, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Control of the annual weed, common groundsel, may be troublesome because of insufficient control by herbicides. Biological control based on stimulating epidemics of the rust fungus Puccinia lagenophorae on common groundsel populations may be an alternative to herbicides if the rust fungus can be integrated with the general use of herbicides against other weeds. Formulations of monolinuron, metoxuron, and pendimethalin were selected for the study. The integration of the rust fungus with each of the three herbicides was evaluated. A three-step procedure was followed to evaluate the integration of the rust fungus and these formulated herbicides. The effect of the selected herbicides on common groundsel was tested in the first step. Only formulated monolinuron completely controlled common groundsel under controlled conditions, indicating that biological control is not required in situations where monolinuron is employed for weed control. The effect of metoxuron and pendimethalin on the rust fungus was tested under controlled conditions in the second step. Formulated metoxuron was not compatible with the rust fungus, indicating that biological control cannot be employed in situations where metoxuron is applied. The effect of pendimethalin on P. lagenophorae epidemics was evaluated using an epidemiological model in the third step. Formulated pendimethalin had no detectable effects on P. lagenophorae epidemics. We concluded that use of P. lagenophorae epidemics for common groundsel control is complementary to application of formulated pendimethalin against other weeds.

Keywords

Monolinuronmetoxuronpendimethalincommon groundsel, Senecio vulgaris L. SENVUPuccinia lagenophorae CookeEpidemicsherbicidesPuccinia lagenophoraesystem management approach
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 6 , December 2002 , pp. 787 - 793
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: Department of Ecology, Experimental Plant Ecology, Catholic University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected]

References

Literature Cited

Altman, J. and Campbell, C. L. 1977. Effect of herbicides on plant diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 15:361–385.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2000. Handbuch Gemüse. Ins, Switzerland: Schweizerische Gemüse-Union. pp. 165–189.Google Scholar
Charudattan, R. 2000. Current status of biological control of weeds. Pages 269–288 In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Technologies in IPM; St. Paul, MN: APS.Google Scholar
Frantzen, J. 1994. The effect of temperature on the germination of telio-spores of Puccinia punctiformis . Phytopathology 84:1043–1046.Google Scholar
Frantzen, J. and Hatcher, P. E. 1997. A fresh view on the control of the annual plant Senecio vulgaris . Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 2:77–85.Google Scholar
Frantzen, J. and Müller-Schärer, H. 1998. A theory relating focal epidemics to crop-weed interactions. Phytopathology 88:180–184.Google Scholar
Frantzen, J. and van den Bosch, F. 2000. Spread of organisms: can travelling and dispersive waves be distinguished? Basic Appl. Ecol. 1:83–92.Google Scholar
Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1972. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 45:145–177.Google Scholar
Müller-Schärer, H. and Frantzen, J. 1996. An emerging system management approach for biological weed control in crops: Senecio vulgaris as a research model. Weed Res. 36:483–491.Google Scholar
Müller-Scharer, H., Scheepens, P. C., and Greaves, M. P. 2000. Biological control of weeds in European crops: recent achievements and future work. Weed Res. 40:83–98.Google Scholar
Paul, N. D., Ayres, P. G., and Hallett, S. G. 1993. Mycoherbicides and other biocontrol agents for Senecio spp. Pestic. Sci. 37:323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, F. 1999. Quantification of the effects of herbicides on the disease epidemic caused by the rust fungus Puccinia lagenophorae Cooke on the plant Senecio vulgaris L. . University of Fribourg, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Shigesada, N. and Kawasaki, K. 1997. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. 218 p.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. New York: Freeman. 859 p.Google Scholar
van den Bosch, F., Frinking, H. D., Metz, J.A.J., and Zadoks, J. C. 1988a. Focus expansion in plant disease. III. Two experimental examples. Phytopathology 78:919–925.Google Scholar
van den Bosch, F., Zadoks, J. C., and Metz, J.A.J. 1988b. Focus expansion in plant disease. I. The constant rate of focus expansion. Phytopathology 78:54–58.Google Scholar
van den Bosch, F., Zadoks, J. C., and Metz, J.A.J. 1988c. Focus expansion in plant disease. II. Realistic parameter-sparse models. Phytopathology 78:59–64.Google Scholar
Wyss, G. S. 1997. Quantitative resistance in the weed-pathosystem Senecio vulgaris-Puccinia lagenophorae Cooke. Ph.D. dissertation. ETH Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C. and van den Bosch, F. 1994. On the spread of plant disease: a theory on foci. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 32:503–521.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1993. Fundamentals of Weed Science. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 556 p.Google Scholar