Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:36:08.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inhibition of Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) Growth by Fosamine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. R. Morey  and
B. E. Dahl
P. R. Morey
Affiliation:
Dep. Biol. Sci., Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409
B. E. Dahl
Affiliation:
Range and Wildlife Mgt., Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fosamine [ethyl hydrogen (aminocarbonyl)phosphonate] acted as a chemical inhibitor of shoot growth for periods of up to 3 yr following a single summer application to honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell] trees. Anatomical study of field, greenhouse, and seedling mesquite indicated that the inhibition of primary and secondary growth caused by fosamine was due to a general cessation of nuclear activity in apical meristems and in the vascular and cork cambia of this species.

Keywords

Anatomycell divisiontrifluralin
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , May 1980 , pp. 251 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Frank, J. R., King, J. A., Goetz, P. C., and Tozer, W. E. 1978. Greenhouse evaluation of the response of ash and maple to growth inhibitors. HortScience 13:434–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Gratkowski, H. J., Stewart, R. E., and Weatherly, H. G. 1978. Triclopyr and krenite herbicides show promise for use in Pacific northwest forests. Down Earth 34:28–31.Google Scholar
3. Hellali, R., Lin, J., and Kester, D. E. 1978. Morphology of noninfectious bud failure symptoms in vegetative buds of almond (Prunus amygdalus Batsch.). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hess, D. and Bayer, D. 1974. The effect of trifluralin on the ultrastructure of dividing cells of the root meristem of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala 4–42’.). J. Cell Sci. 15:429–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Morey, P. R. and Dahl, B. E. 1975. Histological and morphological effects of auxin transport inhibitors on honey mesquite. Bot. Gaz. 136:274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Morey, P. R., Sosebee, R. E., and Dahl, B. E. 1976. Histological effects of ethephon and 2,4,5-T on mesquite. Weed Sci. 24:292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Parka, S. J. and Soper, O. F. 1977. The physiology and mode of action of the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 25:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sass, J. E. 1958. Botanical Microtechnique. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 228 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sinnott, E. W. 1960. Plant Morphogenesis. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New York. 550 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar