Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:20:59.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of evolved thiocarbamate resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) populations from Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2021

David J. Brunton Open the ORCID record for David J. Brunton [Opens in a new window] ,
Peter Boutsalis ,
Gurjeet Gill  and
Christopher Preston
David J. Brunton*
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
Peter Boutsalis
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
Gurjeet Gill
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
Christopher Preston
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: David J. Brunton, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA5064, Australia. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Populations of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) from southern Australia have evolved resistance to the thiocarbamate herbicide prosulfocarb. The inheritance of prosulfocarb resistance was explored by crossing resistant (R) and susceptible (S) individuals. In all families within each cross, except 16.2, the response of the F1 was intermediate between the parents, suggesting that resistance is inherited as a single, partially dominant trait. For 16.2, the response of the F1 was more similar to the S parent, suggesting resistance may be a recessive trait in this population. Segregation at the discriminating dose of 1,200 g ai ha−1 prosulfocarb in population 375-14 fit the ratio (15:1) consistent with two independent dominant alleles; in population 198-15, it fit a ratio (13:3) for two independent alleles, one dominant and one recessive; and in population EP162, it fit a ratio (9:7) for two additive dominant alleles. In contrast, segregation of population 16.2 fit a ratio (7:9) consistent with two independent recessive alleles contributing to prosulfocarb resistance. Four different patterns of resistance to prosulfocarb were identified in different R populations, with inheritance as a dominant allele, dominant and recessive, additive dominant and as an independent recessive allele. This suggests there are several different mechanisms of prosulfocarb resistance present in L. rigidum.

Keywords

Herbicide resistanceprosulfocarbresistance evolutionthiocarbamates
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 2021 , pp. 642 - 647
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Ian Burke, Washington State University

References

Anthony, RG, Hussey, PJ (1999) Dinitroaniline herbicide resistance and the microtubule cytoskeleton. Trends Plant Sci 4:112–116 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01378-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutsalis, P, Gill, GS, Preston, C (2012) Incidence of herbicide resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) across southeastern Australia. Weed Technol 26:391–398 10.1614/WT-D-11-00150.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutsalis, P, Karotam, J, Powles, SB (1999) Molecular basis of resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Sisymbrium orientale and Brassica tournefortii. Pestic Sci 55:507–516 Google Scholar
Brunton, DJ, Boutsalis, P, Gill, G, Preston, C (2019) Resistance to very-long-chain fatty-acid (VLCFA)-inhibiting herbicides in multiple field-selected rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) populations. Weed Sci 67:267–272 10.1017/wsc.2018.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunton, DJ, Boutsalis, P, Gill, G, Preston, C (2020) Varying responses of field-selected herbicide-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) populations to combinations of phorate with PPI herbicides. Weed Sci 68:367–372 10.1017/wsc.2020.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, MWM, Hart, Q, Holtum, JAM, Powles, SB (1994) Resistance to 9 herbicide classes in a population of rigid ryegrass Lolium rigidum. Weed Sci 42:369–377 Google Scholar
Busi, R, Gaines, TA, Vila-Aiub, MM, Powles, SB (2014) Inheritance of evolved resistance to a novel herbicide (pyroxasulfone). Plant Sci 217:127–134 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busi, R, Powles, SB (2013) Cross-resistance to prosulfocarb and triallate in pyroxasulfone-resistant Lolium rigidum . Pest Manag Sci 69:1379–1384 10.1002/ps.3516CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J, Lu, H, Han, H, Yu, Q, Sayer, C, Powles, S (2019) Genetic inheritance of dinitroaniline resistance in an annual ryegrass population. Plant Sci 283:189–194 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmency, H (1996) Movement of resistance genes among plants. Pages 209–220 in Brown TM, ed. Molecular Genetics and Evolution of Pesticide Resistance. Washington, DC: ACS Publications10.1021/bk-1996-0645.ch021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmency, H (2018) Genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. Pages 263–298 in Powles SB, Holtum JAM, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 10.1201/9781351073189-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2020) The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: April 20, 2020Google Scholar
Helps, JC, Paveley, ND, van den Bosch, F (2017) Identifying circumstances under which high insecticide dose increases or decreases resistance selection. J Theor Biol 428:153–167 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.06.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasieniuk, M, Maxwell, BD (1994) Populations genetics and the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Phytoprotection 75:25–35 10.7202/706069arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasieniuk, M, Brûlé-Babel, AL, Morrison, IN (1994) Inheritance of trifluralin resistance in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci 42:123–127 Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M, Brûlé-Babel, AL, Morrison, IN (1996) The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44:176–193 10.1017/S0043174500093747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, AJ, Colliver, CT, Maxwell, BD, Fay, PK, Dyer, WE (1996a) Characterization of wild oat (Avena fatua L) populations and an inbred line with multiple herbicide resistance. Weed Sci 44:847–852 10.1017/S0043174500094819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, AJ, Myers, TM, Jasieniuk, M, Murray, BG, Maxwell, BD, Dyer, WE (2002) Two recessive gene inheritance for triallate resistance in Avena fatua L. J Hered 93:48–50 10.1093/jhered/93.1.48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, AJ, Peterson, DM, Miller, EK, Colliver, CC, Dyer, WE (1996b) Triallate resistance in Avena fatua L. is due to reduced herbicide activation. Pest Biochem Physiol 56:163–173 10.1006/pest.1996.0070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letouzé, A, Gasquez, J (2001) Inheritance of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl resistance in a blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) population. Theor Appl Genet 103:288–296 10.1007/s001220100607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J (2014) Handbook of Biological Statistics. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing. 305 p Google Scholar
Neve, P (2007) Challenges for herbicide resistance evolution and management: 50 years after Harper. Weed Res 47:365–369 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00581.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C (2003) Inheritance and linkage of metabolism-based herbicide cross-resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 51:4–12 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0004:IALOMB]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Mallory-Smith, CA (2001) Biochemical mechanisms, inheritance, and molecular genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Pages 23–37 in Powles SB, Shaner DL, eds. Herbicide Resistance and World Grains. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press10.1201/9781420039085-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Malone, JM (2015) Inheritance of resistance to 2,4-D and chlorsulfuron in a multiple-resistant population of Sisymbrium orientale . Pest Manag Sci 71:1523–1528 10.1002/ps.3956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Tardif, FJ, Powles, SB (1996) Multiple mechanisms and multiple herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum. Pages 117–129 in Brown TM, ed. Molecular Genetics and Evolution of Pesticide Resistance. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society10.1021/bk-1996-0645.ch013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, F, Gasquez, J, Reboud, X (2004) The dominance of the herbicide resistance cost in several Arabidopsis thaliana mutant lines. Genetics 166:449–460 10.1534/genetics.166.1.449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, RK, Malone, J, Gill, G, Preston, C (2017) Inheritance of evolved clethodim resistance in Lolium rigidum populations from Australia. Pest Manag Sci 73:1604–1610 10.1002/ps.4493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Fuerst, EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227 10.1017/S0890037X00023253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, FJ, Powles, SB (1999) Effect of malathion on resistance to soil-applied herbicides in a population of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 47:258–261 10.1017/S0043174500091748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, FJ, Preston, C, Holtum, JAM, Powles, SB (1996) Resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase-inhibiting herbicides endowed by a single major gene encoding a resistant target site in a biotype of Lolium rigidum . Aust J Plant Physiol 23:15–23 Google Scholar
Warkentin, TD, Marshall, G, McKenzie, RIH, Morrison, IN (1988) Diclofop-methyl tolerance in cultivated oats (Avena sativa L.). Weed Res 28:27–35 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1988.tb00782.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q, Han, H, Nguyen, L, Forster, JW, Powles, SB (2009) Paraquat resistance in a Lolium rigidum population is governed by one major nuclear gene. Theor Appl Genet 118:1601–1608 10.1007/s00122-009-1008-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar