Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:00:15.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Weed Management and Cropping Systems on Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Seed in the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David C. Bridges
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849

Abstract

Research was conducted from 1979 through 1982 in east-central Alabama to monitor changes in sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L. ♯ CASOB) seed numbers in the soil under various cropping and weed management systems in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Significant declines in sicklepod seed numbers were attained only when mechanical summer fallow each year prevented replenishment of seed in soil. Repeated disking favored germination and emergence of sicklepod seed and thus caused a reduction in seed numbers. Chemical summer fallow, which relied on postemergence control of emerged sicklepod, did not result in a disturbed seedbed and was less effective in reducing seed numbers. Permitting subcompetitive densities of sicklepod, 0.45 and 0.90 plants/m2, to reach maturity each year resulted in increases in seed numbers in the soil. Increases were more dramatic in conventionally planted soybeans than in no-till culture. Sicklepod produced more pods per plant in tilled culture than in no-till. Sicklepod seed distribution in the upper 30 cm of the soil was not affected by the type of primary tillage.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds: II. The influence of tillage treatments on germination. Sci. Agric. 26:347357.Google Scholar
2. Currey, W. L., Teem, D. H., Jordan, J. H. 1981. Sicklepod competition and control programs in Florida soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc., 34:66.Google Scholar
3. Harper, J. L. 1957. Ecological aspects of weed control. Outlook Agric. 1:197205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Little, T. M. and Hills, F. J. 1978. Subplots as repeated observations. Pages 125138 in Agricultural Experimentation, Design and Analysis. 1st ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
5. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12:316324.Google Scholar
6. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Split plots in space and time. Pages 394395 in Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
7. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379384.Google Scholar