Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T09:17:10.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Three Herbicides on the Sensitivity of Greenhouse-grown Flue-cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Plants to Ozone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Shi-Jean Susana Sung  and
Laurence D. Moore
Laurence D. Moore
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Path. and Physiol., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two Nicotiana tabacum L. cultivars, ‘North Carolina 88’ and ‘Coker 319′, were grown in a charcoal-filtered greenhouse and treated with three different herbicides according to the herbicide labels. Labeled rates (X) for diphenamid (N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenylacetamide), isopropalin (2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylcumidine), and pebulate (S-propyl butylethylthiocarbamate) were 9.2 kg/ha, 2.3 kg/ha, and 6.2 kg/ha, respectively. Three weeks after treatment with 1/2X, X, or 2X rates of herbicide, half of the plants were fumigated with 15 μl/liter ozone for 2.5 h for four consecutive days. North Carolina 88 and Coker 319 grew equally well and were equally sensitive to ozone injury. Ozone reduced plant height and levels of reducing sugars and total nonstructural carbohydrates of both cultivars. Isopropalin, at X and 2X, reduced the ozone sensitivity and growth of both cultivars, while the X rate of pebulate reduced the ozone sensitivity of North Carolina 88. The chemical composition of the plants was not correlated with the sensitivity of the tobacco plants to ozone-induced injury. The major factors governing fleck intensity, growth, and chemical compositions were ozone and herbicide treatments.

Keywords

Diphenamidisopropalinpebulateweather fleck
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 1979 , pp. 167 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carney, A. W., Stephenson, G. R., Ormord, D. O., and Ashton, G. C. 1973. Ozone-herbicide interactions in crop plants. Weed Sci. 21:508–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Collins, W. K., Hawks, S. N. Jr., and Kittrell, B. U. 1971. Isopropalin and diphenamid for weed control in flue-cured tobacco. Tob. Sci. 15:62.Google Scholar
3. Fukuda, M., Kisaki, T., Koiwai, A., Kitano, H., Shinohara, T., and Tanaka, Y. 1975. Studies on weather fleck on tobacco leaves. XIX. Screening of chemicals for control of ozone injury to tobacco. Okayama Jap. Tob. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 35 (Spec. Issue No. 3):75–85. (Tob. Abstr. 19(7/8):1000, 1975).Google Scholar
4. Gaines, T. P. 1975. Determining protein nitrogen in tobacco. Tob. Sci. 19:31–34.Google Scholar
5. Harvey, W. R., Stahr, H. M., and Smith, W. C. 1969. Automated determination of reducing sugars and nicotine alkaloids on the same extract of tobacco leaf. Tob. Sci. 13:13–15.Google Scholar
6. Heggestad, H. E. and Middleton, J. T. 1959. Ozone in high concentrations as cause of tobacco leaf injury. Science 129:208–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Hill, A. C. and Littlefield, N. 1969. Ozone. Effect on apparent photosynthesis, rate of transpiration, and stomatal closure in plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 3:52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hodgson, R. H., Dusbabek, K. E., and Hoffer, B. L. 1974. Dipehamid metabolism in tomato: Time course of an ozone fumigation effect. Weed Sci. 22:205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hodgson, R. H., Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Regan, L. A. 1973. Alteration of diphenamid metabolism in tomato by ozone. Weed Sci. 21:542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hoffman, A. R. 1974. Effects of ozone on nicotine concentration in Nicotiana tabacum leaves. Diss. Abstr. Int. B. 35:2803–2804.Google Scholar
11. Kitamura, T. and Kuroda, S. 1973. Studies on weather fleck on tobacco leaves. VIII. Relation between chemical constituents in leaves and fleck injury (type II and type III). Okayama Jap. Tob. Exp. Stn. Bull. 33:63–70. (Tob. Abstr. 18(5):491, 1974).Google Scholar
12. Kitano, H., Shinohara, T., Yamamoto, Y., Kimura, T., Koiwai, A., Kisaki, T., and Fukuda, M. 1975. Studies on weather fleck on tobacco leaves. XX. Effects of some protective chemicals for weather fleck on the production of tobacco leaves. Okayama Jap. Tob. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 35 (Spec. Issue No. 3):87–95. [Tob. Abstr. 19(7/8):1006, 1975].Google Scholar
13. Klingman, G. C. 1967. Weed control in flue-cured tobacco. Tob. Sci. 11:115–119.Google Scholar
14. Koiwai, A., Kitano, H., Fukuda, M., and Kisaki, T. 1974. Methylenedioxyphenyl and its related compounds as protectants against ozone injury to plants. Agric. Biol. Chem. 38(2):301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kuroda, S., Shinohara, T., Yano, F., and Kumura, T. 1973. Studies on weather fleck on tobacco leaves. III. Statistic analysis of cultural and other environmental conditions in relation to the occurrence of fleck. Okayama Jap. Tob. Exp. Stn. Bull. 33:15–24. [Tob. Abstr. 18(5):493—494, 1974].Google Scholar
16. Menser, H. A. Jr. 1969. Effect of air pollution on tobacco cultivars grown in several states. Tob. Sci. 13:99–104.Google Scholar
17. Menser, H. A., Grosso, J. J., Heggestad, H. E., and Street, O. E. 1964. Air filtration study of “hidden” air pollution injury to tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. Suppl. 39:lviii.Google Scholar
18. Menser, H. A. and Chaplin, J. F. 1975. Effects of ozone air pollution on nitrogen constituents, pH, and water soluble ash of air-cured tobacco leaves. Tob. Sci. 19.108–110.Google Scholar
19. Menser, H. A. and Hodges, G. H. 1969. Air pollution: Effects on the phenol and alkaloid content of cured tobacco leaves. Tob. Sci. 13:169–170.Google Scholar
20. Miller, P. M., Tomlinson, H., and Taylor, G. S. 1976. Reducing severity of ozone damage to tobacco and beans by combining benomyl or carboxin with contact nematicides. Plant Dis. Rep. 60:433–436.Google Scholar
21. Moore, L. D. 1976. Alteration in the total nonstructural carbohydrate content of a susceptible and a resistant tobacco cultivar infected with Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae . Tob. Sci. 20:10–13.Google Scholar
22. Moore, L. D., Reilly, J. J., and Terrill, T. R. 1977. Effects of soil fertility and ambient air pollution on the chemical composition of flue-cured tobacco grown in Virginia. Pages 269–189 in McKenzie, J. L. symposium chairman. Recent Advances in the Chemical Composition of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. 173rd American Chem. Soc. Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
23. Morse, M. A. and Bandeen, J. D. 1970. Effect of herbicides on weeds and flue-cured tobacco. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 1970:23.Google Scholar
24. Nakayama, T., Suyama, I., Iwase, T., Matsuyama, S., and Yamanaka, H. 1973. Studies on weather fleck on tobacco leaves. X. Chemical components and physical properties of flecked (type II and type III) flue-cured leaves. Okayama Jap. Tob. Exp. Stn. Bull. 33:79–90. [Tob. Abstr. 18(5):494,1974].Google Scholar
25. Rodriguez, E. G. and Worsham, A. D. 1973. Herbicides for fluecured tobacco. I. Weed control, methods of soil incorporation, yield and value of tobacco. Tob. Sci. 17:155–158.Google Scholar
26. Rogers, H. H., Jeffries, H. E., Stahel, E. P., Heck, W. W., Ripperton, L. A., and Witherspoon, A. M. 1977. Measuring air pollutant uptake by plants: A direct kinetic technique. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 27.1192–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Shoda, M., Imaizumi, S., Wada, Y., and Suyama, I. 1975. Studies on weather fleck on tobacco leaves. XXI. Effect of oxathiin compounds spray on reducing oxidant injury to tobacco plants. Okayama Jap. Tob. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 35 (Spec. Issue No. 3):97–98. [Tob. Abstr. 19(7/8):1009—1010, 1975].Google Scholar
28. Shoda, M., Imaizumi, S., Wada, Y., and Suyama, I. 1975. Effect of oxathiin compounds spray on the reducing oxidant injury to tobacco plants. Crop. Sci. Soc. Jap. Proc. 44(2):178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Taylor, G. S. and Rich, S. 1974. Ozone injury to tobacco in the field influenced by soil treatments with benomyl and carobxin. Phytopathology 64:814–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Worsham, A. D. 1970. Herbicide performance in flue-cured tobacco. Weed Sci. 18:648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar