Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:54:44.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jolene R. Baumgartner
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Dallas E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Randall S. Currie
Affiliation:
Southwest Research–Extension Center, Kansas State University, Garden City, KS 67846

Abstract

Resistance to imazethapyr was identified in a population of common sunflower that had been treated with imazethapyr for seven consecutive years. The imazethapyr-resistant biotype of common sunflower was approximately 170 times more resistant to imazethapyr than the susceptible biotype based on the rate required for 25% control. Resistance was due to altered acetolactate synthase (ALS) that is less sensitive to imazethapyr. The imazethapyr concentration required to inhibit in vitro ALS activity by 25% was 210–fold higher in the resistant biotype than in the susceptible biotype. Differences in absorption, translocation, and metabolism of imazethapyr in common sunflower biotypes were not sufficient to explain the resistance to imazethapyr.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, D. D., Roeth, F. W., and Martin, A. R. 1996. Shattercane ALS enzyme resistance to nicosulfuron, primsulfuron and imazcthapyr. Proc. North-Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 9697.Google Scholar
Bestman, H. D., Devine, M. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1990. Herbicide chlorsulfuron decreases assimilate transport out of treated leaves of field pennycress (Thlaspi arvenseL.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. 93: 14411448.Google Scholar
Christopher, J. T., Powles, S. B., and Holtum, J.A.M. 1992. Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) involves at least two mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 100: 19091913.Google ScholarPubMed
Christopher, J.T., Powles, S. B., Liljegren, D. R., and Holtum, J.A.M. 1991. Cross resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Plant Physiol. 95: 10361043.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Maddux, L. D., Moshier, L. J., and Stahlman, P. W. 1996. Common sunflower (Helianthus annum) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 10: 317321.Google Scholar
Hall, L. M. and Devine, M. D. 1990. Cross-resistance of a chlorsulfuron-resistant biorype of Stellaria media to a triazolopyrimidine herbicide. Plant Physiol. 93: 962966.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazcthapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9: 192195.Google Scholar
LaRossa, R. A. and Schloss, J. V. 1984, The sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron methyl is an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of acetolactate synthase in Salmonella typhimurium . J. Biol. Chem. 259: 87538758.Google Scholar
Lovell, S. T., Wax, L. M., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. E. 1996. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea resistance in biorype of common waterhemp (Amarantbus rudis). Weed Sci. 44: 789794.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca semola). Weed Technol. 4: 163168.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1987. Sunflower. Pages 626-668 in Fehr, W. R., Fehr, E. L., and Jessen, H. J., eds. Principle of Cultivar Development. Volume 2. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron, inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75: 827831.Google Scholar
Ray, T. B. 1986. Sulfonylurea herbicides as inhibitors of amino-acid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Biochem. Sci. 11: 180183.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Primiani, M. M. 1989. Mechanism of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparla . Plant Physiol. 93: 5561.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Smith, W. F., and Primiani, M. M. 1992. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass and Russian thistle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42: 110118.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83-139 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants, Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, P. R., Eilers, R. J., and Cseke, C. 1993. Lack of cross-resistance of imazaquin-resistant Xanthium strumarium acetolactate synthase to flumetsulam and chlorimuron. Plant Physiol. 103: 281283.Google Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. and Bridge, L. D. 1982. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 30: 514519.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1991. Physiological effects of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 129-137 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinonespotent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76: 545546.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Palmer amaranth (Amarantbus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranlhus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 192197.Google Scholar
Subramanian, M. V., Hung, H., Dias, J. M., Miner, V. W., Butler, J. H., and Jachetta, J. J. 1990. Properties of mutant acetolactate synthases resistant to trizolopyrimidine sulfonanilide. Plant Physiol. 94: 239244.Google Scholar