Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:30:11.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hairy Nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) Interference in Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw
Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of varying densities of hairy nightshade and varying durations of interference on the biomass and seed yield of dry beans. As few as two hairy nightshade plants per meter of row reduced bean seed yield by an average of 13% over the 2 yr of the study. Increasing the density of hairy nightshade to 100 plants per meter resulted in bean yield losses of 77%. Hairy nightshade interference during the first 3 weeks after crop emergence was sufficient to reduce bean yields. Up to 9 weeks of hairy nightshade-free maintenance after crop emergence was required to prevent bean yield losses. Hairy nightshade was a prolific seed producer. At low infestation densities, over 45 000 seeds per plant were produced. Hairy nightshade seed production peaked at over 300 000 seeds m–1 at about 30 plants per m of row. Depending on the length of the growing season, 6 to 9 weeks of weed-free conditions after crop emergence were required to prevent hairy nightshade from producing viable seeds before the first killing frost in the fall. Results are discussed in terms of timing and longevity of control required to reduce hairy nightshade interference in dry beans.

Keywords

Hairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides, Sendt. # SOLSAdry beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Pinto UI 111’Bean biomassbean yieldcompetitionharvest indexinterference thresholdweed biomassweed seed yieldSOLSA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 48 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agamalian, H. S. 1983. Competition of annual weeds in broccoli. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 36:192. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
2. Bassett, I. J. and Munro, D. B. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dum., S. nigrum L., and S. sarrachoides Sendt. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. L., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Edmonds, J. M. 1979. Biosystematics of Solanum L., section Solanum (Maurella). Pages 529–548 in Hawkes, J. G., Lester, R. N., and Skelding, A. D., eds. The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
7. Fennimore, S. A., Mitich, L. W., and Radosevich, S. R. 1984. Interference among bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivar red kidney, barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 32:336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gallant, A. R. 1987. Nonlinear statistical models. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 610 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Holm, L. G., Pluncknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Solanum nigrum L. Pages 430–434 in The World's Worst Weeds – Distribution and Biology. Univ. of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
10. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1983. Influence of planting date on the growth of black nightshade. Weed Sci. 31:180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lee, T. K. 1983. Some studies on the biology and control of black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum Dun.). M. S. Thesis. Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ. 103 pp.Google Scholar
12. Maillet, J. and Abdel-Fatah, H. 1983. Preliminary studies on competition between Solanum nigrum spp. nigrum L. (black nightshade) and transplanted Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (tomato). Weed Res. 23:217–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Majek, B. A. 1981. Nightshade identification and control. Weeds Today 12:5.Google Scholar
14. Mead, R. and Pike, D. J. 1975. A review of response surface methodology from a biometric viewpoint. Biometrics 31:803–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ogg, A. G. and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:25–58.Google Scholar
17. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, E. E. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 29:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32:529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Rawlings, J. O. and Cure, W. W. 1985. The Weibull function as a dose-response model to describe ozone effects on crop yields. Crop Sci. 25:807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Roberts, H. A. and Boddrell, J. E. 1983. Field emergence and temperature requirements for germination in Solanum sarrachoides Sendt. Weed Res. 23:247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Salisbury, E. 1961. Weeds and Aliens. Collins, London. 384 pp.Google Scholar
22. SAS Institute, Inc. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 956 pp.Google Scholar
23. Seber, G.A.F. 1977. Linear regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 465 pp.Google Scholar
24. Walker, R. H., Wells, L. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Bristly starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum) interference in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Weaver, S. E., Smits, N., and Tan, C. S. 1987. Estimating yield losses of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) caused by nightshade (Solanum spp.) interference. Weed Sci. 35:163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wilson, R. G., Wicks, G. A. Jr., and Fenster, C. R. 1980. Weed control in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28:295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar