Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:27:35.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Retardant Response of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Woody Plants to Injections of MBR 18337

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John P. Sterrett ,
Richard H. Hodgson  and
Robert H. Snyder
John P. Sterrett
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Frederick, MD 21701
Richard H. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Frederick, MD 21701
Robert H. Snyder
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Frederick, MD 21701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth retardant activity of MBR 18337 {N-[4-(ethylthio)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-methanesulfonamide} was determined by injection into bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Black Valentine’), California privet seedlings (Ligustrum ovalifolium Hassk.), and saplings of white ash (Fraxinus americana L.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.). Height and leaf expansion of bean were inhibited by 8 μg of MBR 18337 per plant in growth chamber studies. Sprout growth of California privet grown in the greenhouse was inhibited for 92 days by 80 μg of MBR 18337 per tree, and the growth in the field of ash and maple saplings was retarded by 3.2 mg of MBR 18337 per tree for an entire growing season with little injury. Radioassays for 14C-MBR 18337 indicated rapid translocation of 14C-activity in privet from the lower stem to the region of the apical shoot. More than 80% of the MBR 18337 in the xylem and phloem was oxidized within 14 days.

Keywords

Fraxinus americanaAcer rubrumLigustrum ovalifoliumtranslocationmetabolism
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , July 1983 , pp. 431 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, G. K., Kwolek, W. F., Wuertz, D. E., Jumper, G. A., Wilson, C. L., and Carr, S. R. 1977. Regrowth reduction in American elm and sycamore by growth regulator injection. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 102:748–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Domir, S. C. 1978. Chemical control of tree height. J. Arbor. 4:145–153.Google Scholar
3. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347 (Revised edition). 32.Google Scholar
4. Miller, S. S. 1982. Growth and branching of apple seedlings as influenced by pressure-injected plant growth regulators. HortScience:17:775–776.Google Scholar
5. Peterson, J. I. 1969. A carbon dioxide collection accessory for the rapid combustion apparatus for preparation of biological samples for liquid scintillation analysis. Anal. Biochem. 31:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Roberts, B. R., Wuertz, D. E., Brown, G. K., and Kwolek, W. F. 1979. Controlling sprout growth in shade trees by trunk injection. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 104:883–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sterrett, J. P. 1979. Injection methodology for evaluating plant growth retardants. Weed Sci. 27:688–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sterrett, J. P. and Creager, R. A. 1977. A miniature pressure injector for deciduous woody seedlings and branches. HortScience 12:156–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar