Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:30:31.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Variation in Life History Traits in Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) from California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jodie S. Holt
Jodie S. Holt*
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genetic variation of morphological and phenological characters of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) from California was investigated and compared with isozyme data from the same populations. The importance of collection location, individual genotype, and isozyme genotype to phenotypic characteristics was evaluated. Analyses were conducted on 20 individuals collected from each of 10 widely separated populations in California. Replicate plants were started by tubers, grown in pots buried outdoors, and measured during the period from planting through flowering. Results showed that yellow nutsedge is variable across its range in California in all measured traits, including days to sprouting and flowering, height, rachis number and length, aboveground biomass, tuber weight, number of rays, ray length, number of spikelets per ray, as well as spikelet length and width. Population (collection location) was a larger variance component than genotype (individuals over all locations). As found in isozyme analysis, relatively more variation was found among than within populations, typical of clonally reproducing species. Overall, more variation was found in quantitative traits than in isozymes. The level of variation, based on coefficients of variation for each character and population, was similar within populations and not clearly related to cropping history or climate at each site. The two most common isozyme genotypes in the collection differed in four characters: date of emergence, weight of 10 tubers, rachis number, and mean ray length, which may represent different adaptive responses to cultural practices. These results indicate that isozymes do not reflect the high level of genetic and adaptive diversity of yellow nutsedge. Factors that are likely to determine the patterns of variation in this species include breeding system (vegetative reproduction), founder effects, polyploidy, and homogeneity of the agricultural environmental.

Keywords

Yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPESPhenotypegenotypeisozymetuberweedCYPES
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 378 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:1–24.Google Scholar
2. Barrett, S. C. H. 1982. Genetic variation in weeds. Pages 73–98 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L., eds. Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
3. Bendixen, L. E. and Nandihalli, U. B. 1987. Worldwide distribution of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:61–65.Google Scholar
4. Byrd, J. D. 1991. Report of the 1990 cotton weed loss committee. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf.—Cotton Weed Sci. Res. Conf. 15:949.Google Scholar
5. Costa, J. and Appleby, A. P. 1976. Response of two yellow nutsedge varieties to three herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:54–58.Google Scholar
6. Hamrick, J. L. and Allard, R. W. 1975. Correlations between quantitative characters and enzyme genotypes in Avena barbata . Evolution 25:438–443.Google Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Cyperus esculentus L. Pages 125–133 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
8. Holt, J. S. 1992. Phenotypic variation in yellow nutsedge. Western Soc. Weed Sci. Proc. 45:118–119.Google Scholar
9. Horak, M. J. and Holt, J. S. 1986. Isozyme variability and breeding systems in populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34:538–543.Google Scholar
10. Horak, M. J., Holt, J. S., and Ellstrand, N. C. 1987. Genetic variation in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 35:506–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hume, L. and Cavers, P. B. 1982. Geographic variation in a widespread perennial weed, Rumex crispus. The relative amounts of genetic and environmentally induced variation among populations. Can. J. Bot. 60:1928–1937.Google Scholar
12. Keeley, P. E. 1973. Survey of weeds on cotton farms in the San Joaquin Valley. Proc. California Weed Conf. 27:37–47.Google Scholar
13. Keeley, P. E. 1987. Interference and interaction of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) with crops. Weed Technol. 1:74–81.Google Scholar
14. Levin, D. A. and Kerster, H. W. 1971. Neighborhood structure in plants under diverse reproductive methods. Am. Nat. 105:345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lewontin, R. C. 1984. Detecting population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am. Nat. 123:115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Lyman, J. C. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1984. Clonal diversity in Taraxacum officinale (Compositae), an apomict. Heredity 53:1–10.Google Scholar
17. MacDonald, S. E. and Chinnappa, C. C. 1989. Population differentiation for phenotypic plasticity in the Stellaria longipes complex. Am. J. Bot. 76:1627–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Matthiesen, R. L. and Stoller, E. W. 1979. Tuber composition in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) variants. Weed Res. 18:373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Moore, D. S. and McCabe, G. P. 1989. Pages 740–744 in Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.Google Scholar
20. Moran, G. F., Marshall, D. R., and Muller, W. J. 1981. Phenotypic variation and plasticity in the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium L. (Noogoora Burr). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 34:639–648.Google Scholar
21. Mulligan, G. A. and Junkins, B. E. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. 17. Cyperus esculentus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:339–350.Google Scholar
22. Pereira, W., Crabtree, G., and William, R. D. 1987. Herbicide action on purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Pages 195–241 in Weed Ecology. Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
24. SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6.03 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
25. Schoner, C. A., Norris, R. F., and Chilcote, W. 1978. Yellow foxtail (Setaria lutescens) biotype studies: Growth and morphological characteristics. Weed Sci. 26:632–636.Google Scholar
26. Warwick, S. I. 1990. Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Syst. Evol. 169:41–54.Google Scholar
27. Warwick, S. I. 1990. Genetic variation in weeds—with particular reference to Canadian agricultural weeds. Pages 3–18 in Kawano, S., ed. Biological Approaches and Evolutionary Trends in Plants. Academic Press, Ltd., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
28. Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. D. 1986. Genecological variation in recently established populations of Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf). Can. J. Bot. 64:1632–1643.Google Scholar
29. Wolff, K. and Haeck, J. 1990. Genetic analysis of ecologically relevant morphological variability in Plantago lanceolata L. VI. The relation between allozyme heterozygosity and some fitness components. J. Evol. Biol. 3:243–255.Google Scholar
30. Wood, H. and Degabriele, R. 1985. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in populations of Paterson's curse (Echium plantagineum L.) in South-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 33:677–685.Google Scholar