Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:41:55.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foliar Absorption and Translocation of Isoproturon, and its Action on Photosynthesis in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Slender Foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nagi R. Achhireddy ,
Ralph C. Kirkwood  and
William W. Fletcher
Nagi R. Achhireddy
Affiliation:
Dep. Biol., Univ. Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
Ralph C. Kirkwood
Affiliation:
Dep. Biol., Univ. Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
William W. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Dep. Biol., Univ. Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigations were made under controlled environmental conditions of isoproturon [N-(4-isopropylphenyl)-N’,N′-dimethylurea] absorption and translocation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (tolerant) and slender foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. ♯ ALOMY) (sensitive). Effects of isoproturon on 14CO2 fixation and 14C-assimilate translocation were also examined in the test species. The amount of 14C-isoproturon translocated by slender foxtail was about four times greater than by wheat. Foliar application of isoproturon resulted in greater inhibition of photosynthetic 14CO2 fixation in slender foxtail than in wheat. The reduction in 14C-assimilate translocation was also significantly greater in slender foxtail than in wheat.

Keywords

Assimilate translocationphotosynthesis inhibitionALOMY
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , November 1985 , pp. 762 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1983. Farm Chemicals Handbook. Page 134. Meister Publishing Co., Ohio.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Mode of Action of Herbicides. Page 387. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York.Google Scholar
3. Blair, A. M. 1978. Some studies on the uptake of chlortoluron, isoproturon and metoxuron by wheat, Avena fatua and Alopecurus myosuroides . Weed Res. 18:381–387.Google Scholar
4. Bray, G. A. 1960. A simple efficient liquid scintillator for counting aqueous solutions in a liquid scintillator counter. Anal. Biochem. 1:279–285.Google Scholar
5. Dicks, J. W. 1978. Inhibition of the Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts by herbicidal phenylureas. Pestic. Sci. 9:59–62.Google Scholar
6. Sargent, J. A. 1976. Relationship of selectivity to uptake and movement. Pages 303–312 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
7. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14C-labelled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161–191.Google Scholar