Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:47:40.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting Growth of Rooted Aquatics in a River

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. H. Peltier
Affiliation:
Environmental Biology Branch, Division of Health and Safety, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35660
E. B. Welch
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

During 1967, field studies on the Holston River and in the laboratory produced evidence that excessive aquatic plant growths are not soley related to the presence of large amounts of nutrients in water. Factors contributing to growth were the amount of nutrients in sediments, water depth, and turbidity. Water depth and turbidity influence the amount of light which penetrates the water and is available for the growth of rooted plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. American Public Health Association. 1965. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 12th ed. Am. Publ. Health Assoc., New York. 769 p.Google Scholar
2. Boyd, C. E. 1967. Some aspects of aquatic plant ecology. Reservoir Fisheries Resources Symp., April 5-7. Am. Fisheries Soc., Univ. Ga., Athens, Ga. Google Scholar
3. Butcher, R. W. 1933. Studies on ecology of rivers. I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. J. Ecol. 21:5891.Google Scholar
4. Gerloff, G. E. and Krombholz, P. H. 1966. Tissue analysis as a measure of nutrient availability for the growth of angiosperm aquatic plants. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11:529537.Google Scholar
5. Hynes, H. B. N. 1960. The Biology of Polluted Waters. Liverpool Univ. Press, England. 190 p.Google Scholar