Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:13:45.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimated soybean (Glycine max) yield loss from herbicide damage using ground cover or rated stunting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. W. Donald
W. W. Donald*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 269 Agric. Engr. Bldg., UMC, Columbia, MO 65211; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The primary goal of this research was to determine whether crop damage from herbicides measured soon after treatment could estimate relative crop yield loss. Two to 4 wk after spraying soybeans with an unregisrered mixture of rhifensulfuron plus sethoxydim at various rates plus crop oil concentrate, percent stunting was visually rated and percent projected ground cover of soybeans was determined from photographs. In each of 3 yr, relative percent soybean yield was a negative linear function of relative herbicide rate from 0.25× to 2× the registered (1×) rate. The 1× rate of thifensulfuron and sethoxydim was 17.5 and 420 g ai ha−1, respectively. Relative soybean yield was also negatively related linearly to stunting but positively related linearly to soybean ground cover over 3 yr. Linear regression equation models of relative soybean yield versus percent soybean ground cover explained more model variability, more consistently (R 2 ≥ 0.60 in two of 3 yr) than did either stunting (R 2 ≥ 0.60 in one of 3 yr) or relative herbicide rate (R 2 = 0.37 to 0.48 over 3 yr). However, linear regression models for each independent variable differed from year to year and were related to differences in rainfall following treatment. Ways are suggested to increase regression model precision and between-year reproducibility.

Keywords

Sethoxydimsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Pioneer 9381.'Image analysisphytotoxicityvideo photographysethoxydimthifensulfuron
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , August 1998 , pp. 454 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Auld, B. A. 1978. Guidelines for mapping assessments of agricultural weed problems. PANS 24: 67–72.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. A. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to simulated drift of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 7: 740–745.Google Scholar
Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. New York: J. Wiley, pp. 96–135.Google Scholar
Floyd, D. A. and Anderson, J. E. 1982. A new point interception frame for estimating cover of vegetation. Vegetatio 50: 185–186.Google Scholar
Frank, R., Sirons, G. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1983. Atrazine: the impact of persistent residues in soil on susceptible crop species. Can. J. Soil Sci. 63: 315–325.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, D. G. and Kupper, L. L. 1978. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press. 555 p.Google Scholar
Ladlie, J. S. 1991. Guide to Herbicide Injury Symptoms in Soybeans. Hollandale, MN: Agri-Growth Research. 88 p.Google Scholar
Moseley, C., Hatzios, K. K., and Hagood, E. S. 1993. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron in soybean (Glycine max) and morningglory (Ipomoea spp.). Weed Technol. 7: 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, B. T., Shaw, D. R., and Ratliff, R. L. 1995. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to SAN 582H and metolachlor as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 43: 288–292.Google Scholar
Riepma, P. 1965. The effect of herbicides on the relation between cover index and yield index. Weed Res. 5: 252–256.Google Scholar
Salzman, F. P. and Renner, K. A. 1992. Response of soybean to combinations of clomazone, metribuzin, linuron, alachlor, and atrazine. Weed Technol. 6: 922–929.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P. 1993. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 270 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. L., DaSilva, F. J., and Cromer, W. A. 1988. Image processing technique for percent canopy cover evaluation. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Engr. 31: 428–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, D. A. 1994. Tolerance of five annual broadleaf crops to simulated thifensulfurn : tribenuron(2:l) spray drift. Weed Technol. 8: 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wax, L. M., Knuth, L. A., and Slife, F. W. 1969. Response of soybeans to 2,4–D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 17: 388–393.Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, J. D., Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Sobotka, F. E. 1989. Dicamba injury to soybean. Agron. J. 81: 637–643.Google Scholar