Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:12:37.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Trifluralin on Corn (Zea mays) Growth and Nutrient Content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert G. Hartzler
Affiliation:
Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Richard S. Fawcett
Affiliation:
Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Henry G. Taber
Affiliation:
Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

Abstract

Glasshouse experiments were conducted to determine the effects of trifluralin on root growth and mineral relations of corn seedlings. Root weight to shoot weight ratios of corn seedlings were positively correlated to concentrations of trifluralin in soil. Root length to shoot weight ratios, however, were inversely related to trifluralin concentrations. Phosphorous and potassium concentrations in shoot tissue were reduced 60 and 35%, respectively, by 0.25 mg trifluralin kg−1 soil. Growth inhibition due to trifluralin was partially overcome by supplementing soil with nutrients.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Efficacy and rotational crop response to levels and dates of dinitroaniline herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 27:312317.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, L. W. and Kreig, D. R. 1973. Evidence for a trifluralinpotassium nitrate interaction affecting tomato seedling growth. Crop Sci. 13:489490.Google Scholar
3. Bartels, P. G. and Hilton, J. L. 1973. Comparison of trifluralin, oryzalin, pronamide, propham, and colchicine treatments on microtubules. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 3:462467.Google Scholar
4. Brewster, J. L. and Tinker, P. B. 1970. Nutrient cation flows in soil around plant roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:421426.Google Scholar
5. Cathey, G.W. and Sabbe, W. E. 1972. Effects of trifluralin on fertilizer phosphorus uptake patterns by cotton and soybean seedlings. Agron. J. 64:254255.Google Scholar
6. Clarkson, D. T. and Hanson, J. B. 1980. The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31:239298.Google Scholar
7. Epstein, E. 1961. The essential role of calcium in selective cation transport by plant cells. Plant Physiol. 36:437444.Google Scholar
8. Fink, R. J. 1972. Effects of tillage method and incorporation on trifluralin carryover injury. Agron. J. 64:7577.Google Scholar
9. Greweling, T. 1977. Chemical analysis of plant tissue. Search Agriculture 6(8). Agron. 6. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
10. Hess, D. and Bayer, D. 1974. The effect of trifluralin on the ultrastructure of dividing cells of the root meristem of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala 442’). J. Cell Sci. 15:429441.Google Scholar
11. Lignowski, E. M. and Scott, E. G. 1972. Effect of trifluralin on mitosis. Weed Sci. 20:267270.Google Scholar
12. Schweizer, E. E. and Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1966. Persistence of five cotton herbicides in four southern soils. Weed Sci. 14:2226.Google Scholar
13. Standifer, L. C. Jr. and Thomas, C. H. 1965. Response of johnsongrass to soil incorporated trifluralin. Weeds 13:302306.Google Scholar
14. Strang, R. H. and Rogers, R. L. 1971. A microradioautographic study of 14C-trifluralin absorption. Weed Sci. 19:363369.Google Scholar
15. Tennant, D. 1975. A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63:9951001.Google Scholar
16. Wiese, A. F., Chenault, E. W., and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1969. Incorporation of preplant herbicides for cotton. Weed Sci. 17:481483.Google Scholar