Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:22:08.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Flooding on Dinitroaniline Persistence in Soybean (Glycine max) – Rice (Oryza sativa) Rotations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Fayte Brewer ,
Terry L. Lavy  and
Ronald E. Talbert
Fayte Brewer
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Terry L. Lavy
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted with fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) at 1× and 2× rates in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] for 2 consecutive yr to evaluate their persistence in soil and to determine their residual effect on rice (Oryza sativa L.). In another field study that was conducted to evaluate the effect of winter flooding on the persistence of 4× rates of the same herbicides, gas chromatographic analysis and bioassay procedures both revealed increased dissipation of these herbicides because of winter flooding. Flooding rice for 2 or 4 months during winter reduced the adverse effect from herbicidal residues. Laboratory studies evaluated the persistence and volatility of these herbicides at 4 and 25 C in two soils at three moisture contents (air-dried, field capacity, and flooded). The persistence of the three herbicides was similar in the field and in the laboratory and usually followed the order fluchloralin > profluralin = trifluralin. Volatility was most rapid with moisture at field capacity, but overall dissipation was most rapid in flooded soil. Significant dissipation and volatility losses of all three herbicides occurred at 4 C in flooded soil and in soil at field capacity. These studies indicated that winter flooding is effective in reducing the concentration of dinitroaniline herbicides in soil.

Keywords

Volatilitydissipationfluchloralinprofluralintrifluralin
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , September 1982 , pp. 531 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Efficacy and rotational crop response to levels and dates of dinitroaniline herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 27:312–317.Google Scholar
2. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–92.Google Scholar
3. Brewer, F., Lavy, T. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1982. Effect of three dinitroaniline herbicides on rice growth. Weed Sci. 30:153–158.Google Scholar
4. Feeny, R. W. 1966. Effect of trifluralin on the growth of oat seedlings and respiration of excised oat roots. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 20:595–603.Google Scholar
5. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Relative phytotoxicities of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:517–520.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120–124.Google Scholar
7. Hollist, R. L. and Foy, C. L. 1971. Trifluralin interactions with soil constituents. Weed Sci. 19:11–16.Google Scholar
8. Horowitz, M., Hulin, N., and Blumenfeld, T. 1974. Behavior and persistence of trifluralin in soil. Weed Res. 14:213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Dinitroaniline herbicide phytotoxicity as influenced by soil moisture and herbicide vaporization. Weed Sci. 27:536–539.Google Scholar
10. Kearney, P. C., Plimmer, J. R., Wheeler, W. B., and Kontson, A. 1976. Persistence and metabolism of dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 6:229–238.Google Scholar
11. Kennedy, J. M. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. Comparative persistence of dinitroaniline type herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 25:373–381.Google Scholar
12. Messersmith, C. G., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1971. Biological and non-biological dissipation of trifluralin from soil. Weed Sci. 19:285–290.Google Scholar
13. Oliver, L. R. and Frans, R. E. 1968. Inhibition of cotton and soybean roots from incorporated trifluralin and persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 16:199–203.Google Scholar
14. Parka, S. J. and Tepe, J. B. 1969. The disappearance of trifluralin from field soils. Weed Sci. 17:119–122.Google Scholar
15. Parochetti, J. V., Dec, G. W. Jr., and Burt, G. W. 1976. Volatility of eleven dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:529–532.Google Scholar
16. Parr, J. F. and Smith, S. 1973. Degradation of trifluralin under laboratory conditions and soil anaerobiosis. Soil Sci. 115:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Probst, G. W., Golab, T., Herberg, R. J., Holzer, F. J., Parka, S. J., Van Der Schans, C., and Tepe, J. B. 1967. Fate of trifluralin in soils and plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:592–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Savage, K. E. 1973. Nitralin and trifluralin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 21:285–288.Google Scholar
19. Savage, K. E. 1978. Persistence of several dinitroaniline herbicides as affected by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 26:465–471.Google Scholar
20. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.Google Scholar
21. Spencer, W. F. and Cliath, M. M. 1974. Factors affecting vapor loss of trifluralin from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:987–991.Google Scholar
22. Weber, J. B. and Scott, D. C. 1966. Availability of a cationic herbicide adsorbed on clay materials to cucumber seedlings. Science 152:1400–1402.Google Scholar
23. Wiese, A. F. and Smith, D. T. 1970. Herbicidal activity as affected by soil incorporation and rainfall. Weed Sci. 18:515–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Willis, G. H., Wander, R. C., and Southwick, L. M. 1974. Degradation of trifluralin in soil suspensions as related to redox potential. J. Environ. Qual. 3:262–265.Google Scholar
25. Zimdahl, R. L. and Gwynn, S. M. 1977. Soil degradation of three dinitroanilines. Weed Sci. 25:247–251.Google Scholar