Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:30:18.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of moisture stress and glyphosate on adventitious shoot growth of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas J. Tworkoski ,
Michael E. Engle  and
Peter T. Kujawski
Thomas J. Tworkoski*
Affiliation:
Appalachian Fruit Research Station, USDA-ARS, Kearneysville, WV 25430
Michael E. Engle
Affiliation:
Foreign Disease—Weed Science Research, USDA-Frederick, MD 21701
Peter T. Kujawski
Affiliation:
Foreign Disease—Weed Science Research, USDA-Frederick, MD 21701
*
Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of reduced water availability on glyphosate efficacy and adventitious shoot growth in male and female clones of Canada thistle was studied. Water availability was regulated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) in hydroponically grown plants or by withholding water from soil-grown plants. In hydroponic media, there was 50% more adventitious shoot growth from male plants than from female plants. Both PEG and foliarly applied glyphosate reduced the number of adventitious shoots, regardless of gender. In soil, the same number of adventitious shoots formed on untreated male and female plants. However, when glyphosate was applied to plants growing under dry conditions, there was 75% more adventitious shoot growth from males than females. Distribution of glyphosate was similar in male and female plants. Approximately 23% of applied 14C-glyphosate was transported throughout Canada thistle plants within 10 d of treatment regardless of gender or moisture condition. Gender differences in capacity for vegetative reproduction may alter the sex ratio of Canada thistle populations in the field following glyphosate application.

Keywords

Glyphosate, Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] CIRARMale and female clonespolyethylene glycol (PEG)perennial weedregrowthtranslocationCIRAR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 59 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Amor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1975. Seedling establishment and vegetative spread of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res. 15: 407–411.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. J. and Donald, W. W. 1988. Glyphosate effects on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) roots, root buds, and shoots. Weed Res. 28: 37–45.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1987. Effect of soil-applied chlorsulfuron on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root and root bud growth. Weed Technol. 1: 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J. R. and Tworkoski, T. J. 1994. Response of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) clones to chlorsulfuron, clopyralid, and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 8: 565–571.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. C., Klikoff, L. G., and Harper, K. T. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193: 597–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haderlie, L. C., Dewey, S., and Kidder, D. 1987. Canada Thistle Biology and Control. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Bull. 666. 7 p.Google Scholar
Harris, W. 1968. Environmental effects on the sex ratio of Rumex acetosella L. Proc. N. Z. Ecol. Soc. 15: 51–54.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Agricultural Experiment Station Circ. 347.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18: 253–255.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H., Hsiao, A. I., and McIntyre, G. I. 1985. Some effects of humidity on the growth and development of Cirsium arvense . Bot. Gaz. 146: 483–488.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. and Smith, L. W. 1972. Environment and herbicide effects on Canada thistle ecotypes. Weed Sci. 20: 163–167.Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, C. J. and Hall, J. C. 1990. Effects of formulation and environment on absorption and translocation of clopyralid in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and Polygonum convolvulus L. Weed Res. 30: 9–20.Google Scholar
Lauridson, T. C., Wilson, R. G., and Haderlie, L. C. 1983. Effect of moisture stress on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Sci. 31: 674–680.Google Scholar
McIntyre, G. I. 1979. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula . Evidence of competition for water as a factor in the mechanism of root bud inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 57: 2572–2581.Google Scholar
McIntyre, G. I. and Hunter, J. H. 1975. Some effects of the nitrogen supply on growth and development of Cirsium arvense . Can. J. Bot. 53: 3012–3021.Google Scholar
Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55: 1033–1048.Google Scholar
O'Brien, T. P. and McCully, M. E. 1981. The Study of Plant Structure. Principles and Selected Methods. Melbourne, Australia: Termarcarphi. pp. 6.14–6.18.Google Scholar
Putwain, P. D. and Harper, J. L. 1972. Studies in dynamics of plant populations. V. Mechanisms governing the sex ratio in Rumex acetosa and R. Acetosella. J. Ecol. 60: 113–129.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1995. SAS Procedures Guide. Version 6.11. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1992. The Effect of Temperature on Infection of Canada Thistle by Puccinia punctiformis and the Influence of Infection and Moisture Availability on Reproduction in Canada Thistle. . Hood College, Frederick, MD. 43 p.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. J. and Sterrett, J. P. 1987. Modification of root bud growth in Canada thistle with selected plant growth regulators: effects on translocation of glyphosate. J. Plant Growth Regul. 6: 221–232.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. J. and Sterrett, J. P. 1992. Phytotoxic effects, regrowth, and l4C-sucrose translocation in Canada thistle treated with mefluidide, flurprimidol, and systemic herbicides. J. Plant Growth Regul. 11: 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L., Lin, J., and Dall'Armellina, A. A. 1991. Effect of light, watering frequency, and chlorsulfuron on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 39: 590–594.Google Scholar