Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:47:12.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Interspecific Interference, Light Intensity, and Soil Moisture on Soybean (Glycine max), Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Water Uptake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald E. Jones Jr.  and
Robert H. Walker
Ronald E. Jones Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and growth chamber experiments with potted plants were conducted to determine the effects of interspecific root and canopy interference, light intensity, and soil moisture on water uptake and biomass of soybean, common cocklebur, and sicklepod. Canopy interference and canopy plus root interference of soybean with common cocklebur increased soybean water uptake per plant and per unit leaf area. Root interference with soybean decreased common cocklebur water uptake per plant. Canopy interference of soybean with sicklepod increased soybean water uptake per unit leaf area, while root interference decreased uptake per plant. Combined root and canopy interference with soybean decreased water uptake per plant for sicklepod. Soybean leaf area and shoot weight were reduced by root interference with both weeds. Common cocklebur and sicklepod leaf area and shoot weight were reduced by root and canopy interference with soybeans. Only common cocklebur root weight decreased when canopies interfered and roots did not. The relationship between light intensity and water uptake per unit leaf area was linear in both years with water uptake proportional to light intensity. In 1991 water uptake response to tight was greater for common cocklebur than for sicklepod. The relationship between soil moisture level and water uptake was logarithmic. Common cocklebur water uptake was two times that of soybean or sicklepod at −2 kPa of pressure potential. In 1991 common cocklebur water uptake decreased at a greater rate than soybean or sicklepod in response to pressure potential changes from −2 to −100 kPa.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. # XANSTsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Interferencewater relationsXANSTCASOB
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 534 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, J. M. and van Bavel, C.H.M. 1987. Measurement of mass flow of water in the stems of herbaceous plants. Plant Cell Environ. 10:777–782.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A., Tripp, T. N., Wells, J. W., and Hammel, J. E. 1985. Effects of tillage on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference with soybeans (Glycine max) and soil water use. Weed Sci. 34:143–149.Google Scholar
3. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–407.Google Scholar
4. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and soybeans (Glycine max) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206–212.Google Scholar
5. Kucera, J., Cermak, J., and Penka, M. 1977. Improved thermal method of continual recording the transpiration flow rate dynamics. Biol. Plant. 19:413–420.Google Scholar
6. Monks, D. W. and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Interaction between soybean (Glycine max) cultivars and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 36:770–774.Google Scholar
7. Mortensen, D. A. and Coble, H. D. 1989. The influence of soil water content on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:76–83.Google Scholar
8. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1983. Comparative water relations, photosynthesis, and growth of soybean (Glycine max) and seven associated weeds. Weed Sci. 31:318–323.Google Scholar
9. Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 37:187–195.Google Scholar
10. Regnier, E. E., Stoller, E. W., and Nafziger, E. D. 1989. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) root and shoot interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Sakuratani, T. 1981. A heat balance method for measuring water flux in the stem of intact plants. J. Agric. Meteorol. 37:9–17.Google Scholar
12. Sakuratani, T. 1984. Improvement of the probe for measuring water flow rate in intact plants with the heat balance method. J. Agric. Meteorol. 40:273–277.Google Scholar
13. Schurer, K., Griffioen, H., Kornet, J. G., and Visscher, G.J.W. 1979. Measurement of the rate of water flow in plants. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 27:136–141.Google Scholar
14. Scott, H. D. and Geddes, R. D. 1979. Plant water stress of soybean (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum): a comparison under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:285–289.Google Scholar
15. Shurtleff, J. L. and Coble, H. D. 1985. The interaction of soybean (Glycine max) and five weed species in the greenhouse. Weed Sci. 33:669–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Steinberg, S. L., van Bavel, C.H.M., and McFarland, M. J. 1990. Improved sap flow gauge for woody and herbaceous plants. Agron. J. 82:851–854.Google Scholar
17. van Bavel, C.H.M., Lascano, R., and Wilson, D. R. 1978. Water relations of fritted clay. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42:657–659.Google Scholar