Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:01:32.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of DCPA on Anatomy and Cytology of Roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. W. Bingham*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia

Abstract

Dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) on the soil surface inhibited rooting at bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L., var 328) stolon nodes. Histological studies of these root tips showed that cell division had ceased while cell enlargement continued for some time. Cells became excessively large and irregularly shaped. In corn (Zea may L., var. Pioneer 310), radicle cell size was about the same in both instances; however, treated tissue contained six times as many dinucleate cells as untreated radicle tissue. Numerous nuclei were at metaphase stage of mitosis in treated tissue. In untreated onion (Allium cepa L., var. Yellow Globe Danvers) root tips, many nuclei were found at anaphase and telophase stage of mitosis while very few cells were dividing in treated tissue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bingham, S. W. 1967. Influence of herbicides on root development of bermudagrass. Weeds 15:363365.Google Scholar
2. Bingham, S. W. and Schmidt, R. E. 1964. Crabgrass control in turf. Proc. SWC 17:113122.Google Scholar
3. Callahan, L. M. and Engel, R. E. 1965. Tissue abnormalities induced in roots of colonial bentgrass by phenoxyalkyl-carboxylic acid herbicides. Weeds 13:336338.Google Scholar
4. Canvin, D. T. and Friesen, G. 1959. Cytological effects of CDAA and IPC on germinating barley and peas. Weeds 7:153156.Google Scholar
5. Ennis, W. B. Jr. 1948. Responses of crop plants to o-iso-propyl N-phenylcarbamate. Bot. Gaz. 109:473493.Google Scholar
6. Gaskin, T. A. 1964. Effect of preemergence crabgrass herbicide on rhizome development in Kentucky bluegrass. Agron. J. 56:340342.Google Scholar
7. Jensen, W. A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 408 pp.Google Scholar
8. Juska, F. V. 1961. Preemergence herbicides for crabgrass control and their effects on germination of turfgrass species. Weeds 9:137144.Google Scholar
9. Juska, F. V. and Hanson, A. A. 1964. Effect of preemergence crabgrass herbicides on seedling emergence of turfgrass species. Weeds 12:97101.Google Scholar
10. LeBaron, H. M. 1963. Studies with dacthal for weed control in transplanted tomatoes. Proc. NEWCC 17:110115.Google Scholar
11. Scott, M. A. and Struckmeyer, B. E. 1955. Morphology and root anatomy of squash and cucumber seedlings treated with isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)-carbarnate (CIPC). Bot. Gaz. 117:3744.Google Scholar
12. Templeman, W. G. and Sexton, W. A. 1945. Effect of some arylcarbamic esters and related compounds upon cereals and other plant species. Nature 156:630.Google Scholar