Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:44:03.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early-season insect defoliation influences the critical time for weed removal in soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Travis C. Gustafson ,
Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Thomas E. Hunt  and
John L. Lindquist
Travis C. Gustafson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Thomas E. Hunt
Affiliation:
Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, University of Nebraska, 57905 866 Road, Concord NE 68728-2828
John L. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To develop more effective pest-management strategies, it is essential to understand how different pests interact with each other and the crop. Field studies were conducted in 2003 and 2004 at two Nebraska locations to determine the effects of early-season crop defoliation on the critical time for weed removal (CTWR) in narrow-row soybean. Three soybean defoliation levels were selected to simulate 0, 30, and 60% leaf tissue removal by the bean leaf beetle. Weeds were allowed to compete with the crop until V2, V4, V6, R3, and R5 growth stages. There were also season-long weedy and weed-free treatments. Results indicated that the CTWR in soybean occurred earlier as defoliation levels increased from 0 to 60%. The CTWR occurred at V3, V2, and V1 growth stage for 0, 30, and 60% defoliation levels, respectively. Overall, 60% defoliation resulted in earlier CTWR by at least 14 d. Yield losses from defoliation and weed interference were primarily associated with a reduction in number of pods per plant−1.

Keywords

Soybean, Glycine max L. MerrCritical time for weed removalintegrated pest managementmultiple pestspest complexsimulated insect defoliation
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 509 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Board, J. E. and Tan, Q. 1995. Assimilatory capacity effects on soybean yield components and pod number. Crop Sci 35:846–851.Google Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Lindquist, J. L., Shapiro, C. A., and Blankenship, E. E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci 51:408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Ames, IA: Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University, Special Report 80.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Hicks, D. R., Hawkins, S. E., and Ford, J. H. 1983. Soybean recovery from plant cutoff, breakover, and defoliation. Agron. J 75:512–515.Google Scholar
Grymes, C. F., Griffin, J. L., Boethel, D. J., Leonard, R. R., Jordan, D. L., and Russin, J. S. 1999. Soybean response to weed interference and defoliation. Weed Sci 47:90–94.Google Scholar
Hammond, R. B. 1989. Effects of leaf removal at growth stage V1 on yield and other growth parameters. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc 62:96–102.Google Scholar
Helm, C. G., Kogan, M., Onstad, D. W., Wax, L. M., and Jeffords, M. R. 1992. Effects of velvetleaf competition and defoliation by soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on yield of indeterminate soybean. J. Econ. Entomol 85:2433–2439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, R. A., Pedigo, L. P., and Staniforth, D. W. 1984. Effect of velvetleaf competition and defoliation simulating green cloverworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) outbreak in Iowa on indeterminate soybean yield, yield components, and economic decision levels. Environ. Entomol 13:917–925.Google Scholar
Higley, L. G. 1988. Plant and stand response to early season insect-induced stress in a model system. Ph.D. dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Higley, L. G. and Boethel, D. J. (eds.). 1994. Handbook of soybean insect pests. College Park, MD: Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Hunt, T. E., Higley, L. G., and Witkowski, J. F. 1994. Soybean growth and yield after simulated bean leaf beetle injury to seedlings. Agron. J 86:140–146.Google Scholar
Hunt, T. E., Higley, L. G., and Witkowski, J. F. 1995. Bean leaf beetle injury to seedling soybean: consumption, effects of leaf expansion, and economic injury levels. Agron. J 87:183–188.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003a. Row spacing influences the critical timing for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:666–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003b. Yield penalty due to delayed weed control in corn and soybean. Crop Management. DOI:10.1094/CM-2003-0219-01-RS. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2003/delay/.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., and Wolfinger, R. D. 1996. SAS® System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 633 p.Google Scholar
Smelser, R. B. and Pedigo, L. P. 1991. Phenology of Cerotoma trifurcata on soybean and alfalfa in central Iowa. Environ. Entomol 20:514–519.Google Scholar
Talekar, N. S. and Lee, H. R. 1988. Response of soybean to foliage loss in Taiwan. J. Econ. Entomol 81:1363–1368.Google Scholar
Weber, C. R. 1955. Effects of defoliation and topping simulating hail injury to soybeans. Agron. J 47:262–266.Google Scholar
Weber, C. R. and Caldwell, B. E. 1966. Effects of defoliation and stem bruising on soybeans. Crop Sci 6:25–27.Google Scholar
Zeiss, M. R. and Pedigo, L. P. 1996. Timing of food plant availability: effect on survival and oviposition of the bean leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol 25:295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar