Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:01:11.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation of Alachlor in Four Soils as Influenced by Degradation and Sorption Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Pau Y. Yen ,
William C. Koskinen  and
Edward E. Schweizer
Pau Y. Yen
Affiliation:
Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
William C. Koskinen
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Manage. Res. Unit, USDA-Agric. Res. Serv., St. Paul, MN 55108
Edward E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Water Manage. Res. Unit, USDA-Agric. Res. Serv., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the influence of degradation and sorption processes on the dissipation of alachlor in one Colorado soil (Kim clay loam) and three Minnesota soils (Port Byron silt loam, Webster silty clay loam, and Estherville sandy loam) as a function of soil depth. Persistence and movement of alachlor in an irrigated corn production system also were determined on the Kim soil. Laboratory degradation data fit first-order kinetics, and rate constants ranged from 0.0094 to 0.0251 d-1 and varied with soil type and depth. For instance, in 60- to 75-cm-depth Kim soil, alachlor degraded at a slower rate (k = 0.011 d-1) than in surface soil samples (k = 0.022 d-1). Alachlor sorption to the four soils was moderate (Kf = 0.7 to 7.4; Kf,oc = 71 to 470) and concentration dependent (1/n < 1.0). Significant hysteretic desorption of alachlor from soils also was observed (1/n desorption < 1/n sorption). The combined effect of degradation and sorption processes has been used to classify a chemical's potential to leach to groundwater. Based on Kf,oc and dissipation half-life, alachlor would be classified as a “leacher” in Kim, Port Byron, and Estherville soils and classified as transitional between “leacher” and “nonleacher” in the Webster soil. The dissipation first-order rate constant (k) of alachlor in Kim soil in the field was 0.036 α 0.012 d-1. Dissipation was apparently not due to leaching since bromide applied at the same time remained in the top 15 cm during the first 28 d. It appears that laboratory-derived leaching indices may overestimate actual leaching and should be used with caution for predictive or regulatory purposes.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamideLeachingpersistencemovementground water qualitysorption
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beestman, G. B. and Deming, J. M. 1974. Dissipation of acetanilide herbicides from soils. Agron. J. 66:308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bollag, J-M., McGahen, L. L., Minard, R. D., and Liu, S-Y. 1986. Bioconversion of alachlor in an anaerobic stream sediment. Chemosphere 15:153–162.Google Scholar
3. Chesters, G., Simsiman, G. V., Levy, J., Alhajjar, B. J., Fathulla, R. N., and Harkin, J. M. 1989. Environmental fate of alachlor and metolachlor. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 110:1–74.Google Scholar
4. Cohen, S. Z., Creeger, S. M., Carsel, R. F., and Enfield, C. G. 1984. Potential for pesticide contamination of groundwater resulting from agricultural uses. Pages 297–325 in Kruger, R. F. and Seiber, J. N., eds. Treatment and Disposal of Pesticide Wastes. ACS Symp. Ser. No. 259. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5. Feng, P. C. C. 1991. Soil transformation of acetochlor via glutathione conjugation. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 40:136–142.Google Scholar
6. Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. Pages 383–409 in Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
7. Goodrich, J. A., Lykins, B. W. Jr., and Clark, R. M. 1991. Drinking water from agriculturally contaminated groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 20:707–717.Google Scholar
8. Gustafson, D. I. 1989. Groundwater Ubiquity Score: a simple method for assessing pesticide leachability. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8:339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hargrove, R. S. and Merkle, M. G. 1971. The loss of alachlor from soil. Weed Sci. 19:652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Helling, C. S., Zhuang, W., Gish, T. J., Coffman, C. B., Isensee, A. R., Kearney, P. C., Hoagland, D. R., and Woodward, M. D. 1988. Persistence of leaching of atrazine, alachlor, and cyanazine under no-tillage practices. Chemosphere 17:175–187.Google Scholar
11. Huang, L. Q. and Frink, C. R. 1989. Distribution of atrazine, simazine, alachlor, and metolachlor in soil profiles in Connecticut. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 43:159–164.Google Scholar
12. Jury, W. A., Focht, D. D., and Farmer, W. J. 1987. Evaluation of pesticide groundwater pollution potential from standard indices of soil-chemical adsorption and biodegradation. J. Environ. Qual. 16:422–428.Google Scholar
13. Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. Pages 635–660 in Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Koskinen, W. C., Jarvis, L. J., and Dowdy, R. H. 1991. Laboratory robotics applications in environmental research on the fate of pesticides in soil. Proc. Int. Symp. Lab. Automation Robotics. Pages 349–362.Google Scholar
15. Koskinen, W. C., Jarvis, L. J., Dowdy, R. H., Wyse, D. L., and Buhler, D. D. 1991. Automation of atrazine and alachlor extraction from soil using a laboratory robotics system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:561–562.Google Scholar
16. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. 1988. Pesticides and Groundwater. Pages 95–101 in Kilgore, M., ed. Minnesota Environmental Quality: Trends in Resource Conditions and Current Issues. Minnesota State Planning Agency, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
17. Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pages 539–579 in Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
18. Novick, N. J. and Alexander, M. 1985. Cometabolism of low concentrations of propachlor, alachlor, and cycloate in sewage and lake water. Appl. Environ. Micobiol. 49:737–743.Google Scholar
19. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of alachlor and metolachlor as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:874–881.Google Scholar
20. Pothuluri, J. V., Moorman, T. B., Obenhuber, D. C., and Wauchope, R. D. 1990. Aerobic and anaerobic degradation of alachlor in samples from a surface-to-groundwater profile. J. Environ. Qual. 19:525–530.Google Scholar
21. Sharp, D. B. 1988. Alachlor. Pages 301–333 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides—Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
22. Strek, H. J. and Weber, J. B. 1982. Adsorption, mobility and activity comparisons between alachlor (Lasso) and metolachlor (Dual). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:332–338.Google Scholar
23. Walker, A. and Brown, P. A. 1985. The relative persistence in soil of five acetanilide herbicides. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 34:143–149.Google Scholar
24. Walker, A. and Welch, S. J. 1981. Enhanced degradation of some soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 31:49–57.Google Scholar
25. White, D. R. 1987. Dissipation of alachlor and cyanazine in soil. M.S. Thesis, Dep. Biol. Sci., Delta State Univ., Cleveland, MS. 48 pp.Google Scholar
26. Wilderson, M. R. and Kim, K. D. 1986. The Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act: Setting Specific Numerical Values. California Dep. Food and Agric, Environmental Monitoring and Pest Manage., Sacramento, CA. 76 pp.Google Scholar