Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:07:02.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Tolerance of Tomato Cultivars to Metribuzin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. R. Stephenson ,
J. E. McLeod  and
S. C. Phatak
G. R. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
J. E. McLeod
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
S. C. Phatak
Affiliation:
Hort. Res. Station, Simcoe, Ontario, Canada N3Y 4N5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seedlings of fifteen different cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varied greatly in tolerance to metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H) one] applied at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L in quartz sand nutrient culture during the three-true-leaf stage. Tolerance increased with seedling age, but acceptable tolerance was observed about 6 days earlier in the tolerant ‘Fireball’ compared to the susceptible ‘Heinz 1706′. Root uptake and acropetal translocation of metribuzin-carbonyl-14 C was similar in 2-week-old seedlings of susceptible Heinz 1706 and tolerant Fireball seedlings. Differential tolerance was related to the rate of detoxification by metabolism within the tomato leaves, which was approximatley two-fold greater in the tolerant Fireball seedlings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 1976 , pp. 161 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, G.W. 1974. Effect of triazines and substituted ureas on soybean stand. Canada Weed Comm. Res. Rept., East. Sec., p. 97.Google Scholar
2. Buchel, K.H. 1972. Mechanisms of action and structure activity relations of herbicides that inhibit photosynthesis. Pestic. Sci. 3:89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Coble, H.D. and Schrader, J.W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
4. Fortino, J. Jr. and Splittstoesser, W.E. 1974. Response of tomato to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 22:460–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hoagland, D.R. and Arnon, D.I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. cir. 347. 39 pp.Google Scholar
6. Phatak, S.C. and Collin, G.H. 1970. Evaluation of Bay 94337 (metribuzin) programs for field seeded tomatoes. Canada Weed Comm. Res. Rept., East. Sec., p. 195.Google Scholar
7. Phatak, S.C. and Stephenson, G.R. 1973. Influence of light and temperature on metribuzin phytotoxicity to tomato. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53:843–847.Google Scholar
8. Ries, S.K., Zabik, M.J., Stephenson, G.R., and Chen, T.M. 1968. N-Glucosyl metabolite of pyrazon in red beets. Weed Sci. 17:327–331.Google Scholar
9. Smith, A.E. and Wilkinson, R.E. 1974. Differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)one] by soybean cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 32:253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Stephenson, G.R., Dilley, D.R., and Ries, S.K. 1971. Influence of light and sucrose on N-glucosyl pyrazon formation in red beet. Weed Sci. 19:406–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Swanson, C.R., Kadunce, R.E., Hodgson, R.H., and Frear, D.S. 1966. Amiben metabolism in plants. I. Isolation and identification of an N-glucosyl complex. Weeds 14:319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Waywell, C.G. 1974. Herbicide screening trial on potatoes. Canada Weed Comm. Res. Rept., East Sec., p. 293.Google Scholar
13. Waywell, C.G. and Rowberry, R.G. 1974. Report on herbicidevariety interactions in a potato field trial. Canada Weed Comm. Res. Rept., East. Sec., p. 294.Google Scholar